Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200404091916.6f00a24d@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20200404091916.6f00a24d@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Apr 2020 17:16:58 -0600
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKd=3zw4uAbDthp-c=_+4XFup0XEdw8nHOmJDzxS2-qSA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings in Linus' tree
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Cc:     Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

+Nicolas

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 4:19 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next build of Linus' tree (arm multi_v7_defconfig) produced
> these warnings:
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address-cells (2) differs from /soc (1)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address-cells (2) differs from /soc (1)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address-cells (2) differs from /soc (1)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address-cells (2) differs from /soc (1)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address-cells (2) differs from /soc (1)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address-cells (2) differs from /soc (1)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address-cells (2) differs from /soc (1)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address-cells (2) differs from /soc (1)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address-cells (2) differs from /soc (1)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address-cells (2) differs from /soc (1)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address-cells (2) differs from /soc (1)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address-cells (2) differs from /soc (1)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address-cells (2) differs from /soc (1)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:18.4-15: Warning (dma_ranges_format): /soc/firmware:dma-ranges: empty "dma-ranges" property but its #address-cells (2) differs from /soc (1)
>
> I have no idea what caused this :-(

A dtc update combined with changes that landed in the above file after
I tested and fixed the new warnings.

Rob