Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751331AbWBZMSh (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:18:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751333AbWBZMSh (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:18:37 -0500 Received: from 26.mail-out.ovh.net ([213.186.42.179]:43235 "EHLO 26.mail-out.ovh.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751332AbWBZMSg (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:18:36 -0500 Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:18:26 +0100 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: col-pepper@piments.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed delsp=yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera M2/8.51 (Linux, build 1462) X-Ovh-Remote: 213.103.54.253 (d213-103-54-253.cust.tele2.fr) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: fait|type 1&3|0.3|H 0.5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 527 Lines: 18 Hi, having read lkml.org/lkml/2005/5/17/47 , I am wondering how appropriate the new vfat sync policy is. It can be fatal for hardware , at best it is very slow and probably fails it's basic aim of offering increased data security at any price. -- Opera e-mail on Gentoo Linux - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/