Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 6 Apr 2020 12:01:38 -0400
From:   Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc:     Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>,
        Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, philip.li@intel.com
Subject: Re: db4ead2cd5 ("Default enable RCU list lockdep debugging with
 .."): WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
Message-ID: <20200406160138.GJ83565@google.com>
References: <5e89ae97.XlZ1PbIKMXWOOfLI%lkp@intel.com>
 <20200405145232.GY19865@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
 <20200406025056.GA13310@madhuparna-HP-Notebook>
 <20200406152259.GG83565@google.com>
 <20200406153237.GF19865@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200406153237.GF19865@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 08:32:37AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 11:22:59AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 08:20:57AM +0530, Madhuparna Bhowmik wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 07:52:32AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 06:10:31PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > > Greetings,
> > > > > 
> > > > > 0day kernel testing robot got the below dmesg and the first bad commit is
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git dev.2020.03.21a
> > > > 
> > > > Is some of the required conversion still left to be done?  Or on its
> > > > way up some other tree?
> > > > 
> > > > If either of these two, my normal approach would be to hold this commit
> > > > back in order to give the fixes time to hit mainline.
> > > > 
> > > > But either way, please let me know!
> > > >
> > > Yes, some of the patches are not yet reviewed by maintainers and we will
> > > resend them. Also, this report reports a few new ones that we haven't
> > > fixed yet (need some help from maintainers to do so).
> > > We are working on fixing them. May be holding the commit is a
> > > good idea.
> > 
> > I am Ok with holding on to the commit for mainline. But I would like it into
> > linux-next so that we and others can get some more velocity on fixing the
> > remaining issues (and any maintainers who have not yet accepted patches to
> > review those). We fixed most of them but there could be some more lurking.
> > Paul, how does that sound?
> 
> Once v5.7-rc1 comes out, it sounds great!
> 
> (Just got my knuckles rapped (gently) for forgetting to pull this stuff
> out of -next for all of last week.)
> 
> So early next week it returns to -next.

Perfect, thanks!

 - Joel