Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp3665319ybb; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 13:07:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLDvMRJE8GI6U4rVZwpTa6RiAKL6756MDlCFXfypmAPmsM6fwaGh8mYgrk5AHYCfIXp5jaC X-Received: by 2002:aca:3196:: with SMTP id x144mr911916oix.77.1586203632970; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 13:07:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1586203632; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=COIdAL486qSNSbelQDze5sLqQrBcdc1SE3x9roTD261cI/w9Om4j21PQ98uuipn864 8woqUC5i4OYmTJsvGLKWJDDIogCYteU+BNXI4CbaXviO/btD9ugjW9DnuIAGcdSqqgnf 818pnk13mAl0CrPA2By+p21+CWRet9JeqWxwZNLaSReYk6AjpgfMQ3RTfbZTnQG8RXji 162OJN/xIlplwwy3S18/IBJRUp/QZpJr1gaZX9XL5PN0i1V7krQDriZek7kUDDZSHmQQ DZQzwmFneEne3K4g5YmpPGKFyQyW9F9urKDqzxQmM9ddD43k59LtHEp/xqJwXaYgZHQx ZUcg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:dkim-signature:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=/cQeQIFkotsxVl4iOAXgB7AypQjT4YsAA1hb19W7EoY=; b=sg98EXBMXabYb5RvztoiYVEjte42yAVZqVLajs6LQJnujZlRKDlcm7Yl/6Uer/hDZ9 E74Ep5bhaIk0Yn7R//Sz7K6cgX7eSEM+6qyk1N43BOBwqrET9K05O1ZAjF2HrTsrkia4 iOZ3e1dTezc1SVHOK9Vtm9GR1ePXaSs2ecydaXz/S+GjriRvCzHtawbXUPLKkobpStwb ijYz70zCjnaM/tjjYxAjYP5KimSEsZsg0mywfm3V1kbquOOv49+OZIShCZxoG0gLEKh1 9Txn/hXkzwjAnjRmEYMoLnlScrTQUpnzt0h5etVuvRxNvQqBI2EqR0amKRF886YSGsb3 cZfg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=LJRaJOIk; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q15si266313otm.212.2020.04.06.13.06.53; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 13:07:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=LJRaJOIk; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726380AbgDFUFq (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 6 Apr 2020 16:05:46 -0400 Received: from hqnvemgate24.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.143]:4335 "EHLO hqnvemgate24.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726310AbgDFUFq (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Apr 2020 16:05:46 -0400 Received: from hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate24.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 13:04:03 -0700 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Mon, 06 Apr 2020 13:05:45 -0700 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com on Mon, 06 Apr 2020 13:05:45 -0700 Received: from DRHQMAIL107.nvidia.com (10.27.9.16) by HQMAIL101.nvidia.com (172.20.187.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 20:05:45 +0000 Received: from [10.2.164.193] (10.124.1.5) by DRHQMAIL107.nvidia.com (10.27.9.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 20:05:43 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 6/9] media: tegra: Add Tegra210 Video input driver To: Dmitry Osipenko , , , , , , CC: , , , , , References: <1585963507-12610-1-git-send-email-skomatineni@nvidia.com> <1585963507-12610-7-git-send-email-skomatineni@nvidia.com> <38d921a7-5cdf-8d0a-2772-4399dd1a96a0@gmail.com> <9b8cf37b-d2ad-9df2-aad8-216c2c954e69@nvidia.com> <1a12974a-7cc7-2c3a-3995-076b9956714d@gmail.com> <66cc8646-43d3-3fc8-c31d-d0d2efac505f@nvidia.com> <9038ce90-ac53-93e7-ce65-57f6ff1e9b30@nvidia.com> From: Sowjanya Komatineni Message-ID: <36b5627a-8639-6244-8620-4f23828e0638@nvidia.com> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 13:05:42 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL101.nvidia.com (172.20.187.10) To DRHQMAIL107.nvidia.com (10.27.9.16) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-US DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1586203443; bh=/cQeQIFkotsxVl4iOAXgB7AypQjT4YsAA1hb19W7EoY=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:To:CC:References:From:Message-ID:Date: User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP: X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Language; b=LJRaJOIkLv6YKhIRIfeTh+coVu/yi4RULJDCuKHuc5G7ydBH0pTlTgPX09GwKSw/N 7busPDL5R0eOzF3zX82nUdrtwTU4zo5xNOnl79u2aZPi5aZQkxjmxp2S6htrvZ8U8C RYm6gjNqGAwgFYBwjc3lAelcwkWX++ayI1N4wOE/Tj7r8hRd7Dq08DV8vshkggOY6d QNlVQx8D1DO/sBUQbgMhN7uVIS8Oq6CNwy+Nl4/2MiUUYL0kTWbECP0vNf8QXauWpP E9af5mWqT3EHet7lgpG0Uixtia9TqyhZ0y1dl6/bfRkircQODDGV53OYIvoVCapRLv kpO7/pyF7q83g== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/6/20 12:53 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > 06.04.2020 20:02, Sowjanya Komatineni =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >> On 4/6/20 9:37 AM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote: >>> On 4/6/20 9:29 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments >>>> >>>> >>>> 06.04.2020 19:12, Sowjanya Komatineni =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >>>>> On 4/6/20 9:05 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >>>>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 06.04.2020 18:35, Sowjanya Komatineni =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82= : >>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> + /* wait for syncpt counter to reach frame start event >>>>>>>>> threshold */ >>>>>>>>> + err =3D host1x_syncpt_wait(chan->frame_start_sp, thresh, >>>>>>>>> + TEGRA_VI_SYNCPT_WAIT_TIMEOUT, &value); >>>>>>>>> + if (err) { >>>>>>>>> + dev_err(&chan->video.dev, >>>>>>>>> + "frame start syncpt timeout: %d\n", err); >>>>>>>>> + /* increment syncpoint counter for timedout events = */ >>>>>>>>> + host1x_syncpt_incr(chan->frame_start_sp); >>>>>>>> Why incrementing is done while hardware is still active? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The sync point's state needs to be completely reset after resettin= g >>>>>>>> hardware. But I don't think that the current upstream host1x drive= r >>>>>>>> supports doing that, it's one of the known-long-standing problems = of >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> host1x driver. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At least the sp->max_val incrementing should be done based on the >>>>>>>> actual >>>>>>>> syncpoint value and this should be done after resetting hardware. >>>>>>> upstream host1x driver don't have API to reset or to equalize max >>>>>>> value >>>>>>> with min/load value. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So to synchronize missed event, incrementing HW syncpt counter. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This should not impact as we increment this in case of missed event= s >>>>>>> only. >>>>>> It's wrong to touch sync point while hardware is active and it's >>>>>> active >>>>>> until being reset. >>>>>> >>>>>> You should re-check the timeout after hw resetting and manually put >>>>>> the >>>>>> syncpoint counter back into sync only if needed. >>>>> There is possibility of timeout to happen any time even during the >>>>> capture also and is not related to hw reset. >>>>> >>>>> Manual synchronization is needed when timeout of any frame events >>>>> happen >>>>> otherwise all subsequence frames will timeout due to mismatch in even= t >>>>> counters. >>>> My point is that hardware is stopped only after being reset, until the= n >>>> you should assume that sync point could be incremented by HW at any >>>> time. >>>> >>>> And if this happens that HW increments sync point after the timeout, >>>> then the sync point counter should become out-of-sync in yours case, >>>> IIUC. Because host1x_syncpt_incr() doesn't update the cached counter. >>> We wait for enough time based on frame rate for syncpt increment to >>> happen and if it doesn't happen by then definitely its missed event >>> and we increment HW syncpoint for this timed event. >>> >>> cached value gets updated during syncpt wait for subsequent event. >>> >>> syncpt increment happens for all subsequent frame events during video >>> capture. >>> >> Just to be clear, syncpt max value increment happens first and syncpt >> trigger condition is programmed. hw syncpt increment happens based on HW >> events. >> >> Wait time for HW syncpt to reach threshold is tuned to work for all >> frame rates. So if increment doesn't happen by then, its definitely >> missed event. > This is questionable. Technically, speculating about whether the tuned > value is good for all possible cases is incorrect thing to do. > > Although, I guess in practice it should be good enough for the starter > and could be improved later on, once the host1x driver will be improved. By tuned value I meant about 200ms wait timeout for frame event to=20 happen is what we have been using in downstream and with BSP release=20 images which works good for all sensors and bridges we supported so far. > >> In case of missed HW event corresponding to syncpt condition, hw syncpt >> increment does not happen and driver increments it on timeout. >> >> As there is not API to equialize max with min incase of timeout/reset, >> incrementing HW syncpt for timed out event. >> >> syncpt cached value gets updated during syncpt wait when it loads from >> HW syncpt. >> >> As syncpt condition is already triggered, without compensating timeout >> events or leaving syncpt max and hw syncpt in non synchronized state for >> missed events, subsequent streamings will all timeout even on real event= s. >>