Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp3751438ybb; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 15:08:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKOFyRrnBBbZd0wYrQW/5vtLiKCPQX42wtafrAgG/qXAZXoxsIQTbGQhqyBPCzCuwrIL8Xl X-Received: by 2002:a9d:18f:: with SMTP id e15mr1042027ote.42.1586210927260; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 15:08:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1586210927; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EcecosmMq5fBllDcw81KcOkamKMs2JsndTQUIJUOmQyGicxBDDl76SFxotB1U25viW r2hXFXDX2JLreC0ALCC3tQ/nQcz+iVaEivk1Ry8MhmFZ6s3ZVawS/3CTuIxysIl7JBYO cOOonZKIF4smH7CSwyV9GL4D+3BKhGdKAjq9CyvU8Q2X8p1EjpR1+CWnPxdvhClyXCnY jlM8veU0tRC4nIGDaHpy1WPU5fyUiERpnwQkEeUvShQDg1RsvI+ua8Vu7GM4JtSfe7HC mNxokTjjqa+hjYfN+L47hmZrmKlXDziPKpwKykRsRMt786WTjRxm3fPfmrw8WnQRK9Ik Er+Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:dkim-signature:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:references:cc:to:from:subject; bh=HpwSmhwcv0DQ/SMY/515qVkKZ6WeiMUhqqpKIo4nZuE=; b=mhRUiPCAUwq48EiFQK0p2Q2DzJfn/C2tvJzCr8s71nfHku5k/fjViNHcM3JqkcIruV kkAWDIoEFS3rXDKm42S5dz6nr8bpgux0eTaRzY5DE32XkgQHLWnkKcg6Ni5udIGRRbZ5 CCej91vYXc/ccu2EV09chmtBeGOTf2dIzjBaniRe/LqzTZJKdmffCdMTbLUEVmEOlQ2Y ylWPPgnxK8f+F9xLUv5QU0tKsief1xDVdCCXxa4xm8xy8nLhHISEd7v7brNPrlvSArtT W0jRbciG9466tJYoBrHeMCOrixvuHdY2AdilGEBOAfjM7kMWD9x5VUQpdFHbOWu9q50O wbZg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b="Y/WMbuTz"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r21si386953otp.320.2020.04.06.15.08.35; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 15:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b="Y/WMbuTz"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726331AbgDFWH5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 6 Apr 2020 18:07:57 -0400 Received: from hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.64]:1158 "EHLO hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725933AbgDFWH5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Apr 2020 18:07:57 -0400 Received: from hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 15:07:03 -0700 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Mon, 06 Apr 2020 15:07:55 -0700 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com on Mon, 06 Apr 2020 15:07:55 -0700 Received: from DRHQMAIL107.nvidia.com (10.27.9.16) by HQMAIL109.nvidia.com (172.20.187.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 22:07:55 +0000 Received: from [10.2.164.193] (172.20.13.39) by DRHQMAIL107.nvidia.com (10.27.9.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 22:07:54 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 6/9] media: tegra: Add Tegra210 Video input driver From: Sowjanya Komatineni To: Dmitry Osipenko , , , , , , CC: , , , , , References: <1585963507-12610-1-git-send-email-skomatineni@nvidia.com> <1585963507-12610-7-git-send-email-skomatineni@nvidia.com> <200bb96e-2d07-764f-9e14-55538dc742fd@gmail.com> <23bfab09-b464-6e51-9843-06d13000e9b9@nvidia.com> <08cd31d5-e8b9-4d3a-fb0e-0e4462947d96@nvidia.com> <12a834ac-52b1-6dc0-7d3a-3e6a1fa85a2a@gmail.com> Message-ID: <760d071e-0cbc-b3eb-9231-fb9f9ecb44a6@nvidia.com> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 15:07:53 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [172.20.13.39] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) To DRHQMAIL107.nvidia.com (10.27.9.16) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-US DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1586210823; bh=HpwSmhwcv0DQ/SMY/515qVkKZ6WeiMUhqqpKIo4nZuE=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:From:To:CC:References:Message-ID:Date: User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP: X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Language; b=Y/WMbuTziPO5+ZL/2ukt1TSrFKEQXnqx2rlUk2QM3l2SCZ6K3o4Cs3Ubx4A/EU6BC nyj4U/1BM0DsBSfrcwtIPKhTFoqi19r6hYcHAeTGIP0cjPTvS08Bs8WgVfvfv+mPeN JbEAqo0ITJ8Sd7V/8ulFf2IuIoL7mD/WveyHOOqWHosxzlhIeUKaqWrq0XM2ceDhqQ zJhOFJfbMSFOrtmR4Gy0qaJdvEVE2gJdRTr1bDmDgVzK0NOYev0ETUpYexXMK3X/gS 9MQhtNRrUdhEx1poKESQzf0yh85VbkbXqzIyvoBCw9Fq1qJI38QZRm8QE/dQgtHZtB pvWVwMmw/+RYg== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/6/20 3:00 PM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote: > > On 4/6/20 2:39 PM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote: >> >> On 4/6/20 2:15 PM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote: >>> >>> On 4/6/20 2:11 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments >>>> >>>> >>>> 07.04.2020 00:02, Sowjanya Komatineni =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >>>>>>>>>> Am I understanding correctly that this thread will take 100%=20 >>>>>>>>>> CPU, >>>>>>>>>> spinning here, if more than 2 frame-captures queued? >>>>>>>>> on more than 2 frames captures, it breaks thread and on next=20 >>>>>>>>> wakeup it >>>>>>>>> continues >>>>>>>> The wait_event() won't wait if condition is true. >>>>>>> condition is checked when waitqueue is woken up >>>>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.6.2/source/include/linux/wait.h#= L462=20 >>>>>> >>>>> process is put to sleep until the condition evaluates to true or=20 >>>>> signal >>>>> is received. >>>>> >>>>> condition is checked each time the waitqueue head is woken up. >>>> This is a wrong assumption in accordance to the code. > > process is in sleep until the condition is evaluated and when=20 > condition is true wakeup still happens only when wake_up on waitqueue=20 > is called > > This is the reason for using this to prevent blocking while waiting=20 > for the buffers. w.r.t capture list update, wakeup happens when wake_up on waitqueue is=20 called. wakeup also happens on kthread stop signal event. > > >>> >>> when every buffer is available as long as we are in streaming, we=20 >>> should process it. >>> >>> So if wake up happens when list has buffer, it will be processed but=20 >>> at a time we limit processing 2 simultaneous buffer capture starts=20 >>> only. >>> >> Fixing typo. >> >> I meant when ever buffer is available as long as we are in streaming,=20 >> we should process it. >> >> So capture thread processes as long as buffers are available from=20 >> user space limiting 2 simultaneous trigger of captures and thread=20 >> will be in sleep when capture buffers list is empty or no stop thread=20 >> is signaled. > > >