Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:17:47 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert serial_core oopses to BUG_ON
Message-ID: <20060226181747.GB31256@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20060226100518.GA31256@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20060226021414.6a3db942.akpm@osdl.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060226021414.6a3db942.akpm@osdl.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1057
Lines: 31

On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 02:14:14AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Calling serial functions to flush buffers, or try to send more data
> >  after the port has been closed or hung up is a bug in the code doing
> >  the calling, not in the serial_core driver.
> > 
> >  Make this explicitly obvious by adding BUG_ON()'s.
> 
> If we make it
> 
> 	if (!info) {
> 		WARN_ON(1);
> 		return;
> 	}
> 
> will that allow people's kernels to limp along until it gets fixed?

"until" - I think you mean "if anyone ever bothers" so no I don't agree.
The bluetooth folk seem to have absolutely no interest in bug fixing.
Can we mark bluetooth broken please?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/