Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751043AbWBZV42 (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:56:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751144AbWBZV42 (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:56:28 -0500 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.195]:18437 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751043AbWBZV41 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:56:27 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dG+ybXv0pPRYWQkiGs5nPqNwjR37UsthyvPa1UETMJj1JUxV7wVyEGzZ4y9i3PLVC2er4rofDlBlZqbaBpwjoerAYCwZ/OXb6jjaofN1cBG8lA3lcLscycKOqyXpfn6O+dKkR8tbN0GYAqF9u+gBq0FSmgHMGBgt8HkHBOcHguU= Message-ID: <9a8748490602261356l222c9689w8fa1d5e2395bb183@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 22:56:26 +0100 From: "Jesper Juhl" To: "Lee Revell" Subject: Re: Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings Cc: Nix , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1140990819.24141.176.camel@mindpipe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <200602261721.17373.jesper.juhl@gmail.com> <1140986578.24141.141.camel@mindpipe> <87wtfh3i9z.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> <9a8748490602261349v381933b9xeb2ddeedac053910@mail.gmail.com> <1140990819.24141.176.camel@mindpipe> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1267 Lines: 32 On 2/26/06, Lee Revell wrote: > On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 22:49 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > On 2/26/06, Nix wrote: > > > (i.e., there's a reason that warning uses the word *might*.) > > > > > The compiler says "might be used uninitialized" when it cannot > > determine if a variable will be initialized before first use or not. > > Quoting the "silence gcc warning" thread: > > "Really, this is a gcc bug. My version of the compiler: > > gcc version 4.0.3 20051201 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-5) > > Doesn't give this warning. And, since the loop has fixed parameters, > gcc should see not only that it's always executed, but that it could be > unrolled." > Yeah so gcc is not perfect, but that still doesn't change that the intention of the warning and the use of the word "might" is as I said above. -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/