Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751135AbWBZWI3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:08:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751144AbWBZWI3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:08:29 -0500 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:13753 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751135AbWBZWI3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:08:29 -0500 Subject: Re: Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings From: Lee Revell To: Jesper Juhl Cc: Nix , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <9a8748490602261356l222c9689w8fa1d5e2395bb183@mail.gmail.com> References: <200602261721.17373.jesper.juhl@gmail.com> <1140986578.24141.141.camel@mindpipe> <87wtfh3i9z.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> <9a8748490602261349v381933b9xeb2ddeedac053910@mail.gmail.com> <1140990819.24141.176.camel@mindpipe> <9a8748490602261356l222c9689w8fa1d5e2395bb183@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:08:26 -0500 Message-Id: <1140991706.24141.183.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.5.91 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 537 Lines: 15 On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 22:56 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote: > Yeah so gcc is not perfect, but that still doesn't change that the > intention of the warning and the use of the word "might" is as I said > above. Not a very compelling case for changing the kernel rather than getting GCC fixed. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/