Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 7 Apr 2020 21:38:53 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, hch@infradead.org,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        mingo <mingo@redhat.com>, bp <bp@alien8.de>, hpa@zytor.com,
        x86 <x86@kernel.org>, "Kenneth R. Crudup" <kenny@panix.com>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
        Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        jannh@google.com, keescook@chromium.org, David.Laight@aculab.com,
        Doug Covelli <dcovelli@vmware.com>, mhiramat@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86,module: Detect CRn and DRn manipulation
Message-ID: <20200407193853.GP2452@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20200407110236.930134290@infradead.org>
 <20200407111007.429362016@infradead.org>
 <10ABBCEE-A74D-4100-99D9-05B4C1758FF6@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <10ABBCEE-A74D-4100-99D9-05B4C1758FF6@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 11:55:21AM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > On Apr 7, 2020, at 4:02 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Since we now have infrastructure to analyze module text, disallow
> > modules that write to CRn and DRn registers.
> 
> Assuming the kernel is built without CONFIG_PARAVIRT, what is the right way
> for out-of-tree modules to write to CRs? Let’s say CR2?

Most of them there is no real justification for ever writing to. CR2 I
suppose we can have an exception for given a sane rationale for why
you'd need to rewrite the fault address.