Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200407161933.10874-1-Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com> <CY4PR1201MB01366A09C22161ED4B30CE17DEC30@CY4PR1201MB0136.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR1201MB01366A09C22161ED4B30CE17DEC30@CY4PR1201MB0136.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 8 Apr 2020 10:04:18 +0900
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAROwYx0tTR+euFcHCihbmEht6angCW_J0EZgSFvop5Fxw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARC: [plat-hsdk]: fix USB regression
To:     Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>,
        "linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:22 AM Eugeniy Paltsev
<Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> I'm wondering what is proper way to deal with such type of regressions?
> Is is responsibility of person who change kconfig to check (and possibly adjust) affected defconfigs?


I think the patch submitter should take care of
affected defconfigs when (s)he drops select/imply.
Also, this kind of mistake should be caught
in the review process.


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada