Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp431576ybb; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 02:49:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKe8d0tAMZEyp3MGfKsg20imh51zDJYh7U1lf0a5muOFIXRum87lS9z9UT6Wc5AT6bz653K X-Received: by 2002:a9d:221:: with SMTP id 30mr4673683otb.41.1586339359521; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 02:49:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1586339359; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VqbT+UovPU3HQfiVG+zCrvHHR8+HKAccqGqoib5aaY2V2ZZu/wyoE7n5J2/tOkq2h+ NZdSIwNFzgocjzGXfevSff3eqUhI/Z8XMEOGI6ZwXIl5crfhpSLDe3SU/O9cIdihk9LH Yoo5u2+oQq1IK84ZKAs2WQVk25ZPCMmvpm8icnUi88NlwwTfARFxKEqp988GU5o6HOLu qIYKO6zEH6bZP8cx3Nb11pWNUP8L9mIWNUP6eYXDUwNgv4nLJnvwv0+EAxE9xDwumVYG yX+479b3YRniPR6U9t0UsVdWyzTwFQTNlgSjcP8Ixi+ch8QlJRHyAWZcIyW7CX1qPNFE ou3Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:autocrypt :from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=23ggBnjyV6DVPUPSlYi/vjLaUA1btAUE1fHiQRTLJQA=; b=D4ax5RTWaKZoDNVOoKhwr7y6b4MDGDBYn0FyEIP2Yf2Q/AJvyaRb02yz6YWaphDKRU 6JZU2D381U3cqeiFdxHFmxtcXuWpm7JAMvn6r49wITyUg+3rUfIbKuN95PSYFKaf/Ipk Jtm4wbITjbhgPSjtQKQC0Hdj9wTodwabWJvRjKHsmypQ2jf74/b1qz9vhJ/pOb8bjNrA 9TAfdPF01zyRqLua1KJj/Qi04LID67VKlFexfFPNiBSNF80oQPkLau0g6shbGZseJBiz dLBw4Y8+k5AmUQ4z2/4aeNyJb0pGd91bwaWpR7ACGXcq86PwyuwGAJuEkTY42sv6IPvF SpaA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f26si2471046otc.182.2020.04.08.02.49.04; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 02:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727573AbgDHIwK (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 8 Apr 2020 04:52:10 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:55916 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726795AbgDHIwJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2020 04:52:09 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0388YkB6107935 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 04:52:08 -0400 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30920w5a8a-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 04:52:07 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 09:51:53 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 8 Apr 2020 09:51:49 +0100 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0388q1b517957062 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 8 Apr 2020 08:52:01 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134F152052; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 08:52:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc7455500831.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.153.96]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EFE52057; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 08:52:00 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [RFC][Qusetion] the value of cleared_(ptes|pmds|puds|p4ds) in struct mmu_gather To: Peter Zijlstra , Zhenyu Ye Cc: npiggin@gmail.com, will.deacon@arm.com, mingo@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Vasily Gorbik , akpm@linux-foundation.org, luto@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, Marc Zyngier , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arm@kernel.org, xiexiangyou@huawei.com, Gerald Schaefer , linux-s390 References: <20200330121654.GL20696@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> From: Christian Borntraeger Autocrypt: addr=borntraeger@de.ibm.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBE6cPPgBEAC2VpALY0UJjGmgAmavkL/iAdqul2/F9ONz42K6NrwmT+SI9CylKHIX+fdf J34pLNJDmDVEdeb+brtpwC9JEZOLVE0nb+SR83CsAINJYKG3V1b3Kfs0hydseYKsBYqJTN2j CmUXDYq9J7uOyQQ7TNVoQejmpp5ifR4EzwIFfmYDekxRVZDJygD0wL/EzUr8Je3/j548NLyL 4Uhv6CIPf3TY3/aLVKXdxz/ntbLgMcfZsDoHgDk3lY3r1iwbWwEM2+eYRdSZaR4VD+JRD7p8 0FBadNwWnBce1fmQp3EklodGi5y7TNZ/CKdJ+jRPAAnw7SINhSd7PhJMruDAJaUlbYaIm23A +82g+IGe4z9tRGQ9TAflezVMhT5J3ccu6cpIjjvwDlbxucSmtVi5VtPAMTLmfjYp7VY2Tgr+ T92v7+V96jAfE3Zy2nq52e8RDdUo/F6faxcumdl+aLhhKLXgrozpoe2nL0Nyc2uqFjkjwXXI OBQiaqGeWtxeKJP+O8MIpjyGuHUGzvjNx5S/592TQO3phpT5IFWfMgbu4OreZ9yekDhf7Cvn /fkYsiLDz9W6Clihd/xlpm79+jlhm4E3xBPiQOPCZowmHjx57mXVAypOP2Eu+i2nyQrkapaY IdisDQfWPdNeHNOiPnPS3+GhVlPcqSJAIWnuO7Ofw1ZVOyg/jwARAQABzUNDaHJpc3RpYW4g Qm9ybnRyYWVnZXIgKDJuZCBJQk0gYWRkcmVzcykgPGJvcm50cmFlZ2VyQGxpbnV4LmlibS5j b20+wsF5BBMBAgAjBQJdP/hMAhsDBwsJCAcDAgEGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQEXu8 gLWmHHy/pA/+JHjpEnd01A0CCyfVnb5fmcOlQ0LdmoKWLWPvU840q65HycCBFTt6V62cDljB kXFFxMNA4y/2wqU0H5/CiL963y3gWIiJsZa4ent+KrHl5GK1nIgbbesfJyA7JqlB0w/E/SuY NRQwIWOo/uEvOgXnk/7+rtvBzNaPGoGiiV1LZzeaxBVWrqLtmdi1iulW/0X/AlQPuF9dD1Px hx+0mPjZ8ClLpdSp5d0yfpwgHtM1B7KMuQPQZGFKMXXTUd3ceBUGGczsgIMipZWJukqMJiJj QIMH0IN7XYErEnhf0GCxJ3xAn/J7iFpPFv8sFZTvukntJXSUssONnwiKuld6ttUaFhSuSoQg OFYR5v7pOfinM0FcScPKTkrRsB5iUvpdthLq5qgwdQjmyINt3cb+5aSvBX2nNN135oGOtlb5 tf4dh00kUR8XFHRrFxXx4Dbaw4PKgV3QLIHKEENlqnthH5t0tahDygQPnSucuXbVQEcDZaL9 WgJqlRAAj0pG8M6JNU5+2ftTFXoTcoIUbb0KTOibaO9zHVeGegwAvPLLNlKHiHXcgLX1tkjC DrvE2Z0e2/4q7wgZgn1kbvz7ZHQZB76OM2mjkFu7QNHlRJ2VXJA8tMXyTgBX6kq1cYMmd/Hl OhFrAU3QO1SjCsXA2CDk9MM1471mYB3CTXQuKzXckJnxHkHOwU0ETpw8+AEQAJjyNXvMQdJN t07BIPDtbAQk15FfB0hKuyZVs+0lsjPKBZCamAAexNRk11eVGXK/YrqwjChkk60rt3q5i42u PpNMO9aS8cLPOfVft89Y654Qd3Rs1WRFIQq9xLjdLfHh0i0jMq5Ty+aiddSXpZ7oU6E+ud+X Czs3k5RAnOdW6eV3+v10sUjEGiFNZwzN9Udd6PfKET0J70qjnpY3NuWn5Sp1ZEn6lkq2Zm+G 9G3FlBRVClT30OWeiRHCYB6e6j1x1u/rSU4JiNYjPwSJA8EPKnt1s/Eeq37qXXvk+9DYiHdT PcOa3aNCSbIygD3jyjkg6EV9ZLHibE2R/PMMid9FrqhKh/cwcYn9FrT0FE48/2IBW5mfDpAd YvpawQlRz3XJr2rYZJwMUm1y+49+1ZmDclaF3s9dcz2JvuywNq78z/VsUfGz4Sbxy4ShpNpG REojRcz/xOK+FqNuBk+HoWKw6OxgRzfNleDvScVmbY6cQQZfGx/T7xlgZjl5Mu/2z+ofeoxb vWWM1YCJAT91GFvj29Wvm8OAPN/+SJj8LQazd9uGzVMTz6lFjVtH7YkeW/NZrP6znAwv5P1a DdQfiB5F63AX++NlTiyA+GD/ggfRl68LheSskOcxDwgI5TqmaKtX1/8RkrLpnzO3evzkfJb1 D5qh3wM1t7PZ+JWTluSX8W25ABEBAAHCwV8EGAECAAkFAk6cPPgCGwwACgkQEXu8gLWmHHz8 2w//VjRlX+tKF3szc0lQi4X0t+pf88uIsvR/a1GRZpppQbn1jgE44hgF559K6/yYemcvTR7r 6Xt7cjWGS4wfaR0+pkWV+2dbw8Xi4DI07/fN00NoVEpYUUnOnupBgychtVpxkGqsplJZQpng v6fauZtyEcUK3dLJH3TdVQDLbUcL4qZpzHbsuUnTWsmNmG4Vi0NsEt1xyd/Wuw+0kM/oFEH1 4BN6X9xZcG8GYUbVUd8+bmio8ao8m0tzo4pseDZFo4ncDmlFWU6hHnAVfkAs4tqA6/fl7RLN JuWBiOL/mP5B6HDQT9JsnaRdzqF73FnU2+WrZPjinHPLeE74istVgjbowvsgUqtzjPIG5pOj cAsKoR0M1womzJVRfYauWhYiW/KeECklci4TPBDNx7YhahSUlexfoftltJA8swRshNA/M90/ i9zDo9ySSZHwsGxG06ZOH5/MzG6HpLja7g8NTgA0TD5YaFm/oOnsQVsf2DeAGPS2xNirmknD jaqYefx7yQ7FJXXETd2uVURiDeNEFhVZWb5CiBJM5c6qQMhmkS4VyT7/+raaEGgkEKEgHOWf ZDP8BHfXtszHqI3Fo1F4IKFo/AP8GOFFxMRgbvlAs8z/+rEEaQYjxYJqj08raw6P4LFBqozr nS4h0HDFPrrp1C2EMVYIQrMokWvlFZbCpsdYbBI= Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 10:51:59 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200330121654.GL20696@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20040808-0012-0000-0000-000003A08D20 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20040808-0013-0000-0000-000021DDB182 Message-Id: <68affa6e-44cd-37e3-cdfc-8eec31c4097e@de.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.676 definitions=2020-04-07_10:2020-04-07,2020-04-07 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=890 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=2 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004080065 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sorry, just saw that now.. On 30.03.20 14:16, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 12:30:50PM +0800, Zhenyu Ye wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> commit a6d60245 "Track which levels of the page tables have been cleared" >> added cleared_(ptes|pmds|puds|p4ds) in struct mmu_gather, and the values >> of them are set in some places. For example: >> >> In include/asm-generic/tlb.h, pte_free_tlb() set the tlb->cleared_pmds: >> ---8<--- >> #ifndef pte_free_tlb >> #define pte_free_tlb(tlb, ptep, address) \ >> do { \ >> __tlb_adjust_range(tlb, address, PAGE_SIZE); \ >> tlb->freed_tables = 1; \ >> tlb->cleared_pmds = 1; \ >> __pte_free_tlb(tlb, ptep, address); \ >> } while (0) >> #endif >> ---8<--- >> >> >> However, in arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h, pte_free_tlb() set the tlb->cleared_ptes: >> ---8<--- >> static inline void pte_free_tlb(struct mmu_gather *tlb, pgtable_t pte, >> unsigned long address) >> { >> __tlb_adjust_range(tlb, address, PAGE_SIZE); >> tlb->mm->context.flush_mm = 1; >> tlb->freed_tables = 1; >> tlb->cleared_ptes = 1; >> /* >> * page_table_free_rcu takes care of the allocation bit masks >> * of the 2K table fragments in the 4K page table page, >> * then calls tlb_remove_table. >> */ >> page_table_free_rcu(tlb, (unsigned long *) pte, address); >> } >> ---8<--- adding Gerald and Vasily. Gerald can you have a look? >> >> >> In my view, the cleared_(ptes|pmds|puds) and (pte|pmd|pud)_free_tlb >> correspond one-to-one. So we should set cleared_ptes in pte_free_tlb(), >> then use it when needed. > > So pte_free_tlb() clears a table of PTE entries, or a PMD level entity, > also see free_pte_range(). So the generic code makes sense to me. The > PTE level invalidations will have happened on tlb_remove_tlb_entry(). > >> I'm very confused about this. Which is wrong? Or is there something >> I understand wrong? > > I agree the s390 case is puzzling, Martin does s390 need a PTE level > invalidate for removing a PTE table or was this a mistake? >