Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp866626ybb; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 11:25:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKCaAPq7IJc1Hi/Jq8CHUFA3o5GiIPPRjLdnxD1E+GwPA/QtTA/9Z9RJj5Cny1t5M+3FJeg X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5f7:: with SMTP id 110mr6073650otd.73.1586370316916; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 11:25:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1586370316; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ryoBrRuFETu0AKHyhXtnXIbF8KyfBZKLR72fA+ZI6zTy/WNfBRhvhrOUSkwFZZ7Jy+ rtTCUjTCOCf+SlNPNIhkTr9w2zkHkPkBrCyFGqH3Tye87SBz3SVglWcI6dW/xEOM+HAe qmMfZfp34DNt1kJeMG8Vm9dhrCZ6jeSFsO+12mTEgwfFVekjdzieCwTynu4r3lOEsyIN z5wE/na/oeoXTOAMXzgUUhLtWYYH0coRMxompIKXG9wB2g9xhRyx0Pr2ivPDQ1w07Wqe TYquEr5dIbGhlPuCOKkk2omYMFPtClR1H3yE0kun6es+cgnYOLEty78wa/l/tdD8zQsh kE1Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=ZDK3kIn8wZI3d26HJrucZxmgont/8iiI+a41+AHaoqg=; b=XEbkX7ZYctW1+AA+7JWpoVaesZVJrvtKURrezGvNHxN++S8QnGrogbsSf/KhHectkK XQ+YZjvYK2zCJ+LRh9cDtDLNuboZx22ayGe4VQElGctd2otn7sqxHU2Nrz7noCeiyhqP a1iwRwcYuydqyQXTW+DxLXSFZ81r4lYA18tjfSRVeZgYN66Qz4+71xQ4faAzvD30Nhcj oytcgTIVP3B46Rsz5zzbh8QQ2vJaelORFFj68qLKuWi9WQFAB5ffOWZrjdAlCze5eHZ7 amrsyDYGKcVkl2LRNjWO1E170c5GRvZTRUsJj3V1QSFwtfGsQfuKVbz1zFH0gYVablIB cDLg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a6si2746457oto.34.2020.04.08.11.25.03; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 11:25:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730149AbgDHQHs (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 8 Apr 2020 12:07:48 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:43068 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729684AbgDHQHs (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2020 12:07:48 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 9BEC068C4E; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 18:07:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 18:07:43 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , Wei Liu , x86@kernel.org, David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Laura Abbott , Sumit Semwal , Sakari Ailus , Minchan Kim , Nitin Gupta , Christophe Leroy , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Robin Murphy , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: decruft the vmalloc API Message-ID: <20200408160743.GA30662@lst.de> References: <20200408115926.1467567-1-hch@lst.de> <20200408160324.GS25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200408160324.GS25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 05:03:24PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > I haven't read all your patches yet. > > Have you tested it on 32-bit ARM, where the module area is located > _below_ PAGE_OFFSET and outside of the vmalloc area? I have not tested it. However existing in-kernel users that use different areas (and we have quite a few of those) have not been changed at all. I think the arm32 module loader (like various other module loaders) falls into that category.