Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751126AbWB0JNT (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2006 04:13:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751706AbWB0JNT (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2006 04:13:19 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:4834 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751126AbWB0JNS (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2006 04:13:18 -0500 Subject: Re: [Patch 4/7] Add sysctl for delay accounting From: Arjan van de Ven To: dipankar@in.ibm.com Cc: Shailabh Nagar , linux-kernel , lse-tech In-Reply-To: <20060227090414.GA18941@in.ibm.com> References: <1141026996.5785.38.camel@elinux04.optonline.net> <1141028322.5785.60.camel@elinux04.optonline.net> <1141028784.2992.58.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <4402BA93.5010302@watson.ibm.com> <1141029743.2992.71.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060227090414.GA18941@in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:13:14 +0100 Message-Id: <1141031595.2992.76.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1418 Lines: 29 On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 14:34 +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 09:42:23AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 03:38 -0500, Shailabh Nagar wrote: > > > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > > > The function needs to allocate task_delay_info structs for all tasks > > > that might > > > have been forked since the last time delay accounting was turned off. > > > Either we have to count how many such tasks there are, or preallocate > > > nr_tasks (as an upper bound) and then use as many as needed. > > > > it generally feels really fragile, especially with the task enumeration > > going to RCU soon. (eg you'd lose the ability to lock out new task > > creation) > > I haven't yet seen any RCU-based code that does this. Can you point out > what patches you are talking about ? As of 2.6.16-rc4 and -rt15, > AFAICS, you can count tasks by holding the read side of tasklist_lock. > Granted it is a bit ugly to repeat this in order to overcome > the race on dropping tasklist_lock for allocation. there are several people (Christoph for one) who are working on making the tasklist_lock go away entirely in favor of RCU-like locking... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/