Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 9 Apr 2020 10:27:26 +1000
From:   Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc:     Leonardo Bras <leonardo@linux.ibm.com>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
        Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>, peterz@infradead.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] ppc/crash: Reset spinlocks during crash
Message-ID: <20200409002726.GA5135@blackberry>
References: <20200401000020.590447-1-leonardo@linux.ibm.com>
 <871rp6t9di.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
 <02e74be19534ab1db2f16a0c89ecb164e380c12a.camel@linux.ibm.com>
 <1585895551.7o9oa0ey62.astroid@bobo.none>
 <fb98f346a4d6a9d689ae64dae33cbd45d2f8b0df.camel@linux.ibm.com>
 <87v9majhh2.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87v9majhh2.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 10:21:29PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> 
> We should be able to just allocate the rtas_args on the stack, it's only
> ~80 odd bytes. And then we can use rtas_call_unlocked() which doesn't
> take the global lock.

Do we instantiate a 64-bit RTAS these days, or is it still 32-bit?
In the old days we had to make sure the RTAS argument buffer was
below the 4GB point.  If that's still necessary then perhaps putting
rtas_args inside the PACA would be the way to go.

Paul.