Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp1433250ybb; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 01:58:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLovePDPm46xIuLxPyP1zDzFsn03iS5Zod1TIOcVtgGuat8kDXCPMUuW96QCD7rso0ig5KY X-Received: by 2002:aca:c608:: with SMTP id w8mr5575724oif.163.1586422692509; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 01:58:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1586422692; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kIUG8+3XR73FPL3P738/qq4UuI3dyMkH2ZNAsQe7xiZClgwcTSLXJkz6q53OQ4FwfX bLo7va7ieb3BopZyFb6uuZU83nAoJyMt75d1265tzWRm0NbPTo20MPd7miUWdi6XZ2XF oqC5bsdd7NcLxDK35WoqJ8ZDC0Osn6o1PpjGan97C5JvjYFFj0aczu2D0yL8Uilss3tM GmCN0fFI7NSSLYyOlptmx6HKO/uWt2SyHKSg8VeBtF47WVIjzGSxV0ijaaIEbAS5LXJR JjEby5tYB0CtHjiGd+RZ2Wu2BXsRm3ClP1TmbxglopDLVH1ar+5AQfWNGU/563yoXnaG 0d4A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:autocrypt:references:cc:to:from:subject :dkim-signature; bh=2cM+nC39WRQy4oEaNjzY4GHGnalvU5WyGDpJdJ7+AEQ=; b=ecCl9uz5eb8MkRdVb3bZhEtDllKt92Y3O6RWqHAJG9i7Pqmos+qcQXebvhDm1UTBEI oSR9fZBbZhX5aqujlYYFS3PAQwkZAmEl6Jah+e9nZ5m76pu7qgi0IZ0r6Tgf87u0YDTT cqTjM6bNxy2/RWuhRNFDbDF5JWOXOFl5qMkbslRjlsCANQP9C8yMigV7nEKF/2imLDVg T0+TAN//1fUdxV+Ls8UI51cpaSfp8MY0NNyqb5k0fZGYLcoNDAUqNdYrT1nk58zY0HJK FAN0zOWZgkElb6XpgL0fAliIVRlMJYqI866NLbX7gnRjBtpkl9x5i5Ffj/BVElx2dnab JXqA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ciinVsIn; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z13si3460641oix.27.2020.04.09.01.57.57; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 01:58:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ciinVsIn; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726712AbgDII5G (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 9 Apr 2020 04:57:06 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:50453 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725783AbgDII5F (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2020 04:57:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1586422624; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=2cM+nC39WRQy4oEaNjzY4GHGnalvU5WyGDpJdJ7+AEQ=; b=ciinVsIndBCKroz83yaJeihTFm5F04xfZGBFQWUHm2LiW5VeGBHO7sYTrIY+lZ833gtF91 HA5tVbcz4A/yiOKIQYjPRCJ2y07VLThEDtz4EhtoZC84phrefAziZ0xSE21AYUDi9RyfVm G67X2dG2fA5Dpb1IbIvT1Eohtp4m2h8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-280-TnkQ7Va3O52pbTbuRUiXCQ-1; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 04:57:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: TnkQ7Va3O52pbTbuRUiXCQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15760107ACCD; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 08:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.113.222] (ovpn-113-222.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.222]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27ECF5C1C5; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 08:56:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] powerpc/pseries/hotplug-memory: stop checking is_mem_section_removable() From: David Hildenbrand To: piliu , Baoquan He Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Nathan Fontenot , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , Oscar Salvador , Wei Yang References: <20200407135416.24093-1-david@redhat.com> <20200407135416.24093-2-david@redhat.com> <20200408024630.GQ2402@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <16187f69-0e5b-c9c2-a31b-8658425758aa@redhat.com> <85637e60-4d11-2b69-f2a9-1505e0342ce3@redhat.com> Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABtCREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT6JAlgEEwEIAEICGwMFCQlmAYAGCwkIBwMCBhUI AgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl3pImkCGQEACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1o+VA//SFvIHUAvul05u6wKv/pIR6aICPdpF9EIgEU448g+7FfDgQwcEny1pbEzAmiw zAXIQ9H0NZh96lcq+yDLtONnXk/bEYWHHUA014A1wqcYNRY8RvY1+eVHb0uu0KYQoXkzvu+s Dncuguk470XPnscL27hs8PgOP6QjG4jt75K2LfZ0eAqTOUCZTJxA8A7E9+XTYuU0hs7QVrWJ jQdFxQbRMrYz7uP8KmTK9/Cnvqehgl4EzyRaZppshruKMeyheBgvgJd5On1wWq4ZUV5PFM4x II3QbD3EJfWbaJMR55jI9dMFa+vK7MFz3rhWOkEx/QR959lfdRSTXdxs8V3zDvChcmRVGN8U Vo93d1YNtWnA9w6oCW1dnDZ4kgQZZSBIjp6iHcA08apzh7DPi08jL7M9UQByeYGr8KuR4i6e RZI6xhlZerUScVzn35ONwOC91VdYiQgjemiVLq1WDDZ3B7DIzUZ4RQTOaIWdtXBWb8zWakt/ ztGhsx0e39Gvt3391O1PgcA7ilhvqrBPemJrlb9xSPPRbaNAW39P8ws/UJnzSJqnHMVxbRZC Am4add/SM+OCP0w3xYss1jy9T+XdZa0lhUvJfLy7tNcjVG/sxkBXOaSC24MFPuwnoC9WvCVQ ZBxouph3kqc4Dt5X1EeXVLeba+466P1fe1rC8MbcwDkoUo65Ag0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAGJAiUEGAECAA8FAlXLn5ECGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1qA6w/+M+ggFv+JdVsz5+ZIc6MSyGUozASX+bmIuPeIecc9UsFRatc91LuJCKMkD9Uv GOcWSeFpLrSGRQ1Z7EMzFVU//qVs6uzhsNk0RYMyS0B6oloW3FpyQ+zOVylFWQCzoyyf227y GW8HnXunJSC+4PtlL2AY4yZjAVAPLK2l6mhgClVXTQ/S7cBoTQKP+jvVJOoYkpnFxWE9pn4t H5QIFk7Ip8TKr5k3fXVWk4lnUi9MTF/5L/mWqdyIO1s7cjharQCstfWCzWrVeVctpVoDfJWp 4LwTuQ5yEM2KcPeElLg5fR7WB2zH97oI6/Ko2DlovmfQqXh9xWozQt0iGy5tWzh6I0JrlcxJ ileZWLccC4XKD1037Hy2FLAjzfoWgwBLA6ULu0exOOdIa58H4PsXtkFPrUF980EEibUp0zFz GotRVekFAceUaRvAj7dh76cToeZkfsjAvBVb4COXuhgX6N4pofgNkW2AtgYu1nUsPAo+NftU CxrhjHtLn4QEBpkbErnXQyMjHpIatlYGutVMS91XTQXYydCh5crMPs7hYVsvnmGHIaB9ZMfB njnuI31KBiLUks+paRkHQlFcgS2N3gkRBzH7xSZ+t7Re3jvXdXEzKBbQ+dC3lpJB0wPnyMcX FOTT3aZT7IgePkt5iC/BKBk3hqKteTnJFeVIT7EC+a6YUFg= Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: <230658ef-2ab0-1f53-1f04-7b2670c18d8b@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 10:56:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <85637e60-4d11-2b69-f2a9-1505e0342ce3@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09.04.20 09:26, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 09.04.20 04:59, piliu wrote: >> >> >> On 04/08/2020 10:46 AM, Baoquan He wrote: >>> Add Pingfan to CC since he usually handles ppc related bugs for RHEL. >>> >>> On 04/07/20 at 03:54pm, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> In commit 53cdc1cb29e8 ("drivers/base/memory.c: indicate all memory >>>> blocks as removable"), the user space interface to compute whether a memory >>>> block can be offlined (exposed via >>>> /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryX/removable) has effectively been >>>> deprecated. We want to remove the leftovers of the kernel implementation. >>> >>> Pingfan, can you have a look at this change on PPC? Please feel free to >>> give comments if any concern, or offer ack if it's OK to you. >>> >>>> >>>> When offlining a memory block (mm/memory_hotplug.c:__offline_pages()), >>>> we'll start by: >>>> 1. Testing if it contains any holes, and reject if so >>>> 2. Testing if pages belong to different zones, and reject if so >>>> 3. Isolating the page range, checking if it contains any unmovable pages >>>> >>>> Using is_mem_section_removable() before trying to offline is not only racy, >>>> it can easily result in false positives/negatives. Let's stop manually >>>> checking is_mem_section_removable(), and let device_offline() handle it >>>> completely instead. We can remove the racy is_mem_section_removable() >>>> implementation next. >>>> >>>> We now take more locks (e.g., memory hotplug lock when offlining and the >>>> zone lock when isolating), but maybe we should optimize that >>>> implementation instead if this ever becomes a real problem (after all, >>>> memory unplug is already an expensive operation). We started using >>>> is_mem_section_removable() in commit 51925fb3c5c9 ("powerpc/pseries: >>>> Implement memory hotplug remove in the kernel"), with the initial >>>> hotremove support of lmbs. >>>> >>>> Cc: Nathan Fontenot >>>> Cc: Michael Ellerman >>>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt >>>> Cc: Paul Mackerras >>>> Cc: Michal Hocko >>>> Cc: Andrew Morton >>>> Cc: Oscar Salvador >>>> Cc: Baoquan He >>>> Cc: Wei Yang >>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand >>>> --- >>>> .../platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c | 26 +++---------------- >>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c >>>> index b2cde1732301..5ace2f9a277e 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c >>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c >>>> @@ -337,39 +337,19 @@ static int pseries_remove_mem_node(struct device_node *np) >>>> >>>> static bool lmb_is_removable(struct drmem_lmb *lmb) >>>> { >>>> - int i, scns_per_block; >>>> - bool rc = true; >>>> - unsigned long pfn, block_sz; >>>> - u64 phys_addr; >>>> - >>>> if (!(lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED)) >>>> return false; >>>> >>>> - block_sz = memory_block_size_bytes(); >>>> - scns_per_block = block_sz / MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE; >>>> - phys_addr = lmb->base_addr; >>>> - >>>> #ifdef CONFIG_FA_DUMP >>>> /* >>>> * Don't hot-remove memory that falls in fadump boot memory area >>>> * and memory that is reserved for capturing old kernel memory. >>>> */ >>>> - if (is_fadump_memory_area(phys_addr, block_sz)) >>>> + if (is_fadump_memory_area(lmb->base_addr, memory_block_size_bytes())) >>>> return false; >>>> #endif >>>> - >>>> - for (i = 0; i < scns_per_block; i++) { >>>> - pfn = PFN_DOWN(phys_addr); >>>> - if (!pfn_in_present_section(pfn)) { >>>> - phys_addr += MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE; >>>> - continue; >>>> - } >>>> - >>>> - rc = rc && is_mem_section_removable(pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); >>>> - phys_addr += MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE; >>>> - } >>>> - >>>> - return rc; >>>> + /* device_offline() will determine if we can actually remove this lmb */ >>>> + return true; >> So I think here swaps the check and do sequence. At least it breaks >> dlpar_memory_remove_by_count(). It is doable to remove >> is_mem_section_removable(), but here should be more effort to re-arrange >> the code. >> > > Thanks Pingfan, > > 1. "swaps the check and do sequence": > > Partially. Any caller of dlpar_remove_lmb() already has to deal with > false positives. device_offline() can easily fail after > dlpar_remove_lmb() == true. It's inherently racy. Sorry, s/dlpar_remove_lmb/lmb_is_removable/ -- Thanks, David / dhildenb