Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 15:13:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 15:13:25 -0400 Received: from gusi.leathercollection.ph ([202.163.192.10]:57219 "EHLO gusi.leathercollection.ph") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 15:13:08 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 03:13:38 +0800 (PHT) From: Federico Sevilla III To: "M. Edward Borasky" Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: ext2 vs. ext3? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 21 Oct 2001 at 11:52, M. Edward Borasky wrote: > Can I get a management-level (features and benefits, traderoffs, etc.) > guide to the differences between the ext2 and ext3 filesystems? I just > loaded Red Hat 7.1.94 aka 7.2 beta aka Roswell on my system and it > offered me the choice, with no guidance as to the tradeoffs. I don't know if this is the kind of "management-level" information you're looking for, but the main website of the ext3 project (as listed by Freshmeat) is . Good information in the overview section which comes after all the download links. Basically ext3 builds on ext2 to add journalling support, which means significantly less (almost nil) fsck time in the eventuality of an unclean powerdown. There are other journalling filesystems for Linux right now aside from ext3: ReiserFS by Hans Reiser's Namesys , SGI's XFS , and IBM's JFS . However only ext3 provides a smooth upgrade/downgrade path from ext2 which is the default on most Linux systems. All the rest require you to backup your data, redo your filesystem, then restore your data. Also, only ReiserFS in the mainstream Linus kernel tree. Ext3 is added in the Alan Cox tree. XFS and JFS are yet to be merged. Maybe in 2.5 (the next development tree), and hopefully 2.6 as a stable. But that's yet to be seen of course, as they haven't started. For now XFS and JFS provide patches to allow you to get working kernel support for them. I personally use XFS and have found that it is very stable, as have a lot of other fellow XFS users. I'm not saying it's the absolute best. But I'm saying it's great, and is fairly stable. :) --> Jijo -- Federico Sevilla III :: jijo@leathercollection.ph Network Administrator :: The Leather Collection, Inc. GnuPG Key: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/