Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHk-=wgjGgfUfVm_DpTay5TS03pLCgUWqRpQS++90fSE2V-e=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <BB768A53-4A6F-4C69-8FBC-8BCAB1F4F280@lca.pw>
In-Reply-To: <BB768A53-4A6F-4C69-8FBC-8BCAB1F4F280@lca.pw>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 9 Apr 2020 10:05:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjfngA7nHAsie7bW_JmKBhUyV9oV7zmDbZuchkJK3sR1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: Two small fixes for recent syzbot reports
To:     Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 9:58 AM Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> wrote:
>
> On the other hand, this makes me worry who is testing on linux-next every day.

Well, probably not very many people outside of robots.

Which is fine, but is also why I'd like robot failures to then be a big deal.

           Linus