Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 9 Apr 2020 18:55:21 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
cc:     Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        keescook@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: Harden STRICT_MODULE_RWX
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2004070939041.1817@pobox.suse.cz>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2004091854280.31635@pobox.suse.cz>
References: <20200403163716.GV20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200403165631.hrxxm3pnzqa4vxln@treble> <alpine.LSU.2.21.2004061146590.26870@pobox.suse.cz> <20200406104615.GA9629@linux-8ccs> <20200406112732.GK20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <alpine.LSU.2.21.2004070939041.1817@pobox.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> I am still wondering if there are modules out there with sections flags 
> combination which would cause the same problem with layout_sections() and 
> move_module() logic I described earlier. But that it is a separate issue.

And of course I misread the condition in layout_sections() and all should 
be fine. Oh well...

Miroslav