Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751526AbWB0RZA (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:25:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751529AbWB0RZA (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:25:00 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:60610 "EHLO hera.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751519AbWB0RY7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:24:59 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:25:01 -0800 Organization: OSDL Message-ID: <20060227092501.7be9b1a2@localhost.localdomain> References: <200602261721.17373.jesper.juhl@gmail.com> <1140986578.24141.141.camel@mindpipe> <87wtfh3i9z.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> <9a8748490602261349v381933b9xeb2ddeedac053910@mail.gmail.com> <1140990819.24141.176.camel@mindpipe> <9a8748490602261356l222c9689w8fa1d5e2395bb183@mail.gmail.com> <1140991706.24141.183.camel@mindpipe> <9a8748490602261412x6f610253mf0a991bd76cded89@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: build.pdx.osdl.net 1141061092 26977 10.8.0.54 (27 Feb 2006 17:24:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@osdl.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:24:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1363 Lines: 34 On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:12:51 +0100 "Jesper Juhl" wrote: > On 2/26/06, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 22:56 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > > Yeah so gcc is not perfect, but that still doesn't change that the > > > intention of the warning and the use of the word "might" is as I said > > > above. > > > > Not a very compelling case for changing the kernel rather than getting > > GCC fixed. > > > > I think we are misunderstanding eachother. Or rather, I seem to have > misread what Nix wrote. > > I saw "(i.e., there's a reason that warning uses the word *might*.)" > and mistakenly read it as a question - "is there a reason that warning > uses the word *might*?". > I then proceeded to answer that question. > When I read your latest mail I then couldn't make sense of things any > longer and went back and read the previous mails again and realized my > mistake. > > My bad, sorry. I went hunting for this in the GCC bugzilla, and one bug basically said. "Yeah, we know the initialization checking code doesn't work right, but fixing it is too hard" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/