Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp1976191ybb; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:32:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLgsqpWydMnGWjxhCzeNDbqxMApWEBzDBrEDJ5sEtVwcst9oKeflwFBsGNZvVuW8P0Kwhqb X-Received: by 2002:a37:5a02:: with SMTP id o2mr488874qkb.380.1586460775254; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 12:32:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1586460775; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mphyjHCV+P3fCKifvjNoIw8PtsVrk0TZaLmSyQYE65oOlw6FT3aNVizXOB2WWM4oHW yYk25qFsWPdD8KOPZ+pbBXa9Pjd3i2Vi1FTFIJ29dJF9IL4aSqgGAocIPOIb2FHXrRig VR131NzuBUwQbCS44VlO5+WbRKfrWLAmylt5ZJ1/GpyLFGMhw5WRm/mQ381CDA7kLyLD FTOvmOO9lcBmx7L2SZpi+v4tjwT1HFNbHCdArekERkAYr5kaQJHf3ZZNvszOR/Jkh+4P dEYR9eS2AKFdwTjqxlNPwTe+JaBoMGmzM2wPp2n/2oFNbqYjTmnUMYsJntBrPRYUtEsV kzKg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=fJhpjuKs0vPZ+1uTENYlpZSqOZXxma91FL3tuf8dZvA=; b=Lb3tfRaHuYXKullRMFGs//Oi94Fcda+zs8SrxTn7TWh7aPJPdej1isVyKLATuIaG1q LdMS9L9l6XcCLmhqMUKrpaocg+I9gMcJ4p8wpuIN+Qks6abxroH1h2GoNc9fNtedpxzO tLu7/wNwVxRQYgcrK0k/0fFY+9uBkewN8wLJDdSMK1A/la17oci/1nXRQfdaqNa4XNaZ NsjsV31IAenB5p+TmBOWYKXswqwQBdjoApxGKf1NTpH4bNAu2tX3nrStNYAwkennYH// 8ObwhLz5shUgB74k/RR67PBSdHCikvqNPpSakOydXlLXRApTLkCiVOecJ5B1zteIGJ7b u7TQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j185si5456701qke.41.2020.04.09.12.32.39; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 12:32:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726678AbgDITBo (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 9 Apr 2020 15:01:44 -0400 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:40705 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725970AbgDITBo (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2020 15:01:44 -0400 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (pool-72-93-95-157.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [72.93.95.157]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 039J19lw021995 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 9 Apr 2020 15:01:10 -0400 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 5B2B242013D; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 15:01:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 15:01:09 -0400 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Arvind Sankar , Borislav Petkov , Colin Ian King , Gary Lin , Jiri Slaby , Sergey Shatunov , Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/9] EFI fixes for v5.7-rc Message-ID: <20200409190109.GB45598@mit.edu> References: <20200409130434.6736-1-ardb@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200409130434.6736-1-ardb@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 03:04:25PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > The following changes since commit 594e576d4b93b8cda3247542366b47e1b2ddc4dc: > > efi/libstub/arm: Fix spurious message that an initrd was loaded (2020-03-29 12:08:18 +0200) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi.git tags/efi-urgent Hi Ard, By any chance does this series fix a kexec failure which I bisected down to 0a67361dcdaa ("efi/x86: Remove runtime table address from kexec EFI setup data")? Or if it doesn't, is this a known failure? I'm currently building Linus's latest branch to see if it's been fixed since v5.6-11114-g9c94b39560c3 (which is where I first noticed it) and while I was waiting for v5.6-12349-g87ebc45d2d32 to finish building so I could test it, I noticed these patches, and so I figured I'd fire off this quick question. Thanks, - Ted