Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:00:41 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Cc: greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org,
       akpm@osdl.org, davej@redhat.com, perex@suse.cz, kay.sievers@vrfy.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
Message-ID: <20060227200041.GA11400@suse.de>
References: <20060227190150.GA9121@kroah.com> <20060227203520.0df1d548.diegocg@gmail.com> <20060227194941.GD9991@suse.de> <20060227205759.4a7c7c13.diegocg@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060227205759.4a7c7c13.diegocg@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 817
Lines: 23

On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 08:57:59PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
> El Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:49:41 -0800,
> Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> escribi?:
> 
> 
> > An explicit example of this is the evolution that sys_futex went
> > through, even after it was made a syscall...
> 
> I see...sorry for not explaining myself: Isn't "testing" just an
> alias for "unstable"?

No, look at the different descriptions that I gave them in the README
please.  They are very different.  If you think the wording there is not
precise enough, could you suggest some other wording?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/