Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 15:39:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 15:38:48 -0400 Received: from shake.vivendi.hu ([213.163.0.180]:18306 "EHLO vega.digitel2002.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 15:38:39 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 21:39:06 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?B?R+Fib3IgTOlu4XJ0?= To: Federico Sevilla III Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ext2 vs. ext3? Message-ID: <20011021213906.B19390@vega.digitel2002.hu> Reply-To: lgb@lgb.hu In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Operating-System: vega Linux 2.4.12 i686 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 03:13:38AM +0800, Federico Sevilla III wrote: > Basically ext3 builds on ext2 to add journalling support, which means > significantly less (almost nil) fsck time in the eventuality of an unclean > powerdown. By the way ... And what's about index usage in ext2(ext3) directories? Some months ago there was a benchmark sheet publicated in this list and it shown major performance win on handling large directories. Is it considered to include into ext2/ext3 implementation in Linus or Alan Cox series of kernels? Or probably did I miss something? > For now XFS and JFS provide patches to allow you to get working kernel > support for them. I personally use XFS and have found that it is very > stable, as have a lot of other fellow XFS users. I'm not saying it's the > absolute best. But I'm saying it's great, and is fairly stable. :) Yes, our country-wide proxy server is XFS/Linux based. - Gabor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/