Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932212AbWB0UFI (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:05:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932234AbWB0UFI (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:05:08 -0500 Received: from smtp.bulldogdsl.com ([212.158.248.8]:16396 "EHLO mcr-smtp-002.bulldogdsl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932212AbWB0UFH (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:05:07 -0500 X-Spam-Abuse: Please report all spam/abuse matters to abuse@bulldogdsl.com From: Alistair John Strachan To: Greg KH Subject: Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:05:17 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, Andrew Morton , davej@redhat.com, perex@suse.cz, Kay Sievers References: <20060227190150.GA9121@kroah.com> <200602271952.08949.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> <20060227195727.GA10752@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20060227195727.GA10752@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602272005.17470.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1718 Lines: 47 On Monday 27 February 2006 19:57, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 07:52:08PM +0000, Alistair John Strachan wrote: > > On Monday 27 February 2006 19:01, Greg KH wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > + > > > +Interfaces in the testing state can move to the stable state when the > > > +developers feel they are finished. They can not be removed from the > > > +kernel tree without going through the obsolete state first. > > > + > > > +It's up to the developer to place their interface in the category they > > > +wish for it to start out in. > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ gregkh-2.6/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/devfs > > > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ > > > +What: devfs > > > +Date: July 2005 > > > +Contact: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > > [snip] > > > > July 2005? Either this date is wrong or the document is out of date. > > Heh, I wish. Have you looked at > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt lately? If you're going by the time (OBSOLETE) was added to the kernel help message, this predates July 2005. If we're going by "no earlier than when feature-removal-schedule was introduced", then I guess this is correct. But even now, devfs is still in the kernel. Thanks for the answer anyway, I guess this is a non-issue (who will try to use code that can't be selected via config?). -- Cheers, Alistair. 'No sense being pessimistic, it probably wouldn't work anyway.' Third year Computer Science undergraduate. 1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/