Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S276665AbRJUTtU>; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 15:49:20 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S276661AbRJUTtL>; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 15:49:11 -0400
Received: from cc361913-a.flrtn1.occa.home.com ([24.0.193.171]:11678 "EHLO
	mirai.cx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S276659AbRJUTs4>;
	Sun, 21 Oct 2001 15:48:56 -0400
Message-ID: <3BD326C6.FB226EA9@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 12:49:26 -0700
From: J Sloan <jjs@pobox.com>
Organization: J S Concepts
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.13-pre5 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@lina.inka.de>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The new X-Kernel !
In-Reply-To: <E15vO29-0008ED-00@calista.inka.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Bernd Eckenfels wrote:

> Well, it is not a question of moving X or Office into Kernel Space. But
> current development clearly shows, that some things like Video Card Access
> need Kernel Support. IMHO the Amount of GDI related Functions in NT Kernel
> are too much, but X11 is not exactly the Windowing System you can consider
> well suited for Desktop and Game Use.

That strikes me as odd, can you explain further?

I have had a wonderful experience with XF86
as a daily work environment and entertainment
platform (multimedia, 3d intetrnet gaming etc).

cu

jjs

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/