Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200409130434.6736-1-ardb@kernel.org> <20200409130434.6736-4-ardb@kernel.org>
 <CAMzpN2gJWwVun1Kp6vGuza9LM5KpB=0EwsP8x8eOJQuDGh38Hg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMzpN2jFbf8k99pWaTYRBmSB+iNAKYsufjEhqO6Vv0qxAcHyGA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200409210847.GA1312580@rani.riverdale.lan> <CAMj1kXFhtK=FRDKBE5OtenNEtpK=kVwyo+0nqJZ_K80RmtYxEg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200410151612.GA970420@rani.riverdale.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20200410151612.GA970420@rani.riverdale.lan>
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 10 Apr 2020 18:03:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXGMNMdgjinYNgrN2wGRFG4rKE2YHo-=3s4Ofv2KPUMqKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] efi/x86: Move efi stub globals from .bss to .data
To:     Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Cc:     Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
        Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
        Sergey Shatunov <me@prok.pw>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 17:16, Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 10:20:42AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 23:08, Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 04:53:07PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> > > > > Can we use the -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss compiler flag instead of
> > > > > explicitly marking global variables?
> > > >
> > > > Scratch that.  Apparently it only works when a variable is explicitly
> > > > initialized to zero.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Brian Gerst
> > >
> > > Right, there doesn't seem to be a compiler option to turn off the use of
> > > .bss altogether.
> >
> > Yeah. I'll try to come up with a way to consolidate this a bit across
> > architectures (which is a bit easier now that all of the EFI stub C
> > code lives in the same place). It is probably easiest to use a section
> > renaming trick similar to the one I added for ARM (as Arvind suggested
> > as well, IIRC), and get rid of the per-symbol annotations altogether.
>
> Does that work for 32-bit ARM, or does it need to be .data to tell the
> compiler to avoid generating GOT references? If that's fine, we don't
> actually need to rename sections -- linker script magic is enough. For
> eg, the below pulls the EFI stub bss into .data for x86 without the need
> for the annotations.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
> index 508cfa6828c5..e324819c95bc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ SECTIONS
>                 _data = . ;
>                 *(.data)
>                 *(.data.*)
> +               drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/lib.a:(.bss .bss.*)
>                 _edata = . ;
>         }
>         . = ALIGN(L1_CACHE_BYTES);

No, we can add this to ARM as well, and get rid of the
__efistub_global annotations entirely.

We'll still need .data.efistub for the .data pieces, but that is a
separate issue.