Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751253AbWB0W0E (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:26:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751435AbWB0W0E (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:26:04 -0500 Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com ([67.18.224.114]:50507 "EHLO nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751253AbWB0W0D (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:26:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060224014251.GC25787@kroah.com> References: <8B3A62DF-6991-4C46-A294-6DF314D24AF4@kernel.crashing.org> <20060224014251.GC25787@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Cc: Greg KH , Linux Kernel Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: what's a platform device? Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:25:52 -0600 To: Russell King X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - kernel.crashing.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1521 Lines: 43 >>> This makes sense, but you seem to be talking about hierarchy more >>> the >>> functionality. I agree in your description of hierarchy. >>> >>> I was looking at it from a functional point of view, maybe more from >>> the device view then from the bus. I need a struct device type that >>> contains resources, a name, an id. I'll do matching based on name. >>> From a functional point of view platform does all this. >>> >>> Based on your description would you say that a platform_device's >>> parent device should always be platform_bus? [I'm getting at the >>> fact >>> that we allow pdev->dev.parent to be set by the caller of >>> platform_device_add]. >>> >>> Hmm, as I think about this further, I think that its more >>> coincidence >>> that the functionality for the "kumar" bus is equivalent to that of >>> the "platform" bus. >>> >> >> What about a new bus_type that uses all the sematics of the >> platform_bus. >> Doing someting like the following which would allow the caller to >> specify >> their own bus_type. >> >> I'm just trying to avoid duplicating alot of code that already >> exists in >> base/platform.c > > I'm ok with this patch, Russell? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=114072367307531&w=2 Russell, comments? - kumar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/