Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp1825351ybb; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 12:46:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLdvq0b1bhDVcX2dQQrRP24EzXoqcBI8YwFZMiycyTPS1JMT6KSf5s7srLaFrcq3NsqlhPa X-Received: by 2002:a37:68cd:: with SMTP id d196mr2753851qkc.188.1586634410089; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 12:46:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1586634410; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DOEEqxj7NrcdXGwT8sIYWiUuVM6e+7xmjpYAi8xIUdj74SdV2Hi4XgWiL0v8gW0XTd kyBOn/oZA9BduKLy1QbmYFXYKBUhdgXK9PDPv+tjx2XxfcR9VJAXCqdFgH4282zAig8E sjB1bIUWvXVw/Pk6n68vcrCJ2KptQaXbBlK6ZrNl4feJhEQeFXnWQtqvOhOfnbKHwdjv foFs1DtmX9rBwFsPMuQxMFdetwFVT5/TrWnkwhvwsrZONP6EC+z3Do9zWvthm9bg+BIi mEKllXmlTJij6Q46Jq2cea9DqZ60BB/alCIZdxQ3SlZiqGJjH+O0bx+utEIli0hBs/K3 +rLA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=7ayllRqp9nG1xH4h0/nkverFiCFz3Nhk6x/ONfK8ef8=; b=I82/H6EMFockIdUPETOjBUIx4//8UJPWqV3Ww+9SiDnEKhCFNdfeL6NFG/pTtWZom0 3cty2iC3q0kd3ekEs3zrwTEhfuEFtqFa5MzTKlPKjCAcPat4RMagcNFr00j54lEDD9eT eJdnpZO47YlahZWzeQlOqbjB4in6S8Khxv5rXVHdrQmAhLyKnWCMOa8m7jBghZ7x5fFn eMsEP0AlEUO7Zent8wc41RE2S4n9qOjljB1nQLEFKAOb6aPLawz2Zi8JyAOMGa22UrTX lg8WTuG2IPyfzoj85ZmmyUgnl+ag94XVVKdsiUPjby0M/8AtW6bxhEYBMNM2cl3gfw5Q 74hg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z36si3319084qta.352.2020.04.11.12.46.35; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 12:46:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726795AbgDKToq (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 11 Apr 2020 15:44:46 -0400 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:57761 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726167AbgDKTop (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Apr 2020 15:44:45 -0400 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (pool-72-93-95-157.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [72.93.95.157]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 03BJhp5B029461 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 11 Apr 2020 15:43:52 -0400 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 9189742013D; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 15:43:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 15:43:51 -0400 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Dave Young Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , linux-efi , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , kexec@lists.infradead.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Arnd Bergmann , Arvind Sankar , Borislav Petkov , Colin Ian King , Gary Lin , Jiri Slaby , Sergey Shatunov , Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/9] EFI fixes for v5.7-rc Message-ID: <20200411194351.GQ45598@mit.edu> References: <20200409130434.6736-1-ardb@kernel.org> <20200409190109.GB45598@mit.edu> <20200409201632.GC45598@mit.edu> <20200409235716.GF45598@mit.edu> <20200410135442.GA6772@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200410135442.GA6772@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:54:42PM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > The runtime cleanup looks a very good one, but I also missed that, > userspace kexec-tools will break with the efi setup_data changes. But > kexec_file_load will just work with the cleanup applied. Hmmm, I wonder if there could be some kselftest or kunit tests that would make it easier to pick up these sorts of regressions earlier? - Ted