Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Peng Wang <rocking@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Simplify the code of should_we_balance()
To:     mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
        vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <245c792f0e580b3ca342ad61257f4c066ee0f84f.1586594833.git.rocking@linux.alibaba.com>
Message-ID: <6f372bce-151e-79e1-2fda-d8b2bcf777d6@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Sun, 12 Apr 2020 16:42:21 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <245c792f0e580b3ca342ad61257f4c066ee0f84f.1586594833.git.rocking@linux.alibaba.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 4/11/20 5:20 PM, Peng Wang wrote:
> We only consider group_balance_cpu() after there is no idle
> cpu. So, just do comparison before return at these two cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Wang <rocking@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>   kernel/sched/fair.c | 16 +++++-----------
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 1ea3ddd..81b2c647 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9413,7 +9413,7 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data);
>   static int should_we_balance(struct lb_env *env)
>   {
>   	struct sched_group *sg = env->sd->groups;
> -	int cpu, balance_cpu = -1;
> +	int cpu;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Ensure the balancing environment is consistent; can happen
> @@ -9434,18 +9434,12 @@ static int should_we_balance(struct lb_env *env)
>   		if (!idle_cpu(cpu))
>   			continue;
>   
> -		balance_cpu = cpu;
> -		break;
> +		/* Are we the first idle CPU? */
> +		return cpu == env->dst_cpu;
>   	}
>   
> -	if (balance_cpu == -1)
> -		balance_cpu = group_balance_cpu(sg);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * First idle CPU or the first CPU(busiest) in this sched group
> -	 * is eligible for doing load balancing at this and above domains.
> -	 */
> -	return balance_cpu == env->dst_cpu;
> +	/* Are we the first balance CPU of this group? */
> +	return group_balance_cpu(sg) == env->dst_cpu;
>   }
>   
>   /*
> 

+juri.lelli@redhat.com