Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 13 Apr 2020 22:38:58 +0200
From:   Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
        Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 27/35] netfilter: nf_tables: Allow set
 back-ends to report partial overlaps on insertion
Message-ID: <20200413223858.17b0f487@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200413163900.GO27528@sasha-vm>
References: <20200407000058.16423-1-sashal@kernel.org>
        <20200407000058.16423-27-sashal@kernel.org>
        <20200407021848.626df832@redhat.com>
        <20200413163900.GO27528@sasha-vm>
Organization: Red Hat
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:39:00 -0400
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 02:18:48AM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
>
> >I'm used to not Cc: stable on networking patches (Dave's net.git),
> >but I guess I should instead if they go through nf.git (Pablo's tree),
> >right?  
> 
> Yup, this confusion has caused for quite a few netfilter fixes to not
> land in -stable. If it goes through Pablo's tree (and unless he intructs
> otherwise), you should Cc stable.

Hah, thanks for clarifying.

What do you think I should do specifically with 72239f2795fa
("netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: Drop spurious condition for overlap detection
on insertion")?

I haven't Cc'ed stable on that one. Can I expect AUTOSEL to pick it up
anyway?

-- 
Stefano