Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200407063345.4484-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <bad9e0bd5504df83092c7add2d84331e164b60cc.camel@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <bad9e0bd5504df83092c7add2d84331e164b60cc.camel@linux.intel.com>
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Apr 2020 22:21:47 -0600
Message-ID: <CAHmME9rOzmF4K965U69tFZi2SS3rW9SHed2bJ=_PD+xu8LqMYw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/mce/therm_throt: remove unused
 platform_thermal_notify function pointer
To:     Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
        X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        bberg@redhat.com, bp@suse.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 9:56 PM Srinivas Pandruvada
<srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-04-07 at 00:33 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > A long time ago platform_thermal_notify was added as some generic
> > mechanism for platform drivers to hook thermal events. It seems as
> > though this has been entirely superseded, and nothing uses it. Remove
> > the plumbing for this, since this code runs in an interrupt hot path.
> Good idea.

Will you take this into your tree? If not, how do your thermal patches
usually go in? A reviewed-by might be useful in that case.

Jason