Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
References: <20200122092526.2436421-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com> <6f661498f58c6a519095d0657413f4b89d3ef21e.camel@pengutronix.de>
User-agent: mu4e 1.3.3; emacs 26.3
From:   Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Cc:     linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: reset: meson: add gxl internal dac reset
In-reply-to: <6f661498f58c6a519095d0657413f4b89d3ef21e.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:28:08 +0200
Message-ID: <1jimi2tqsn.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On Thu 23 Jan 2020 at 11:13, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> wrote:

> On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 10:25 +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> Add the reset line of the internal DAC found on the amlogic gxl SoC family
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
>> ---
>>  include/dt-bindings/reset/amlogic,meson-gxbb-reset.h | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset/amlogic,meson-gxbb-reset.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset/amlogic,meson-gxbb-reset.h
>> index ea5058618863..883bfd3bcbad 100644
>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/reset/amlogic,meson-gxbb-reset.h
>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset/amlogic,meson-gxbb-reset.h
>> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
>>  #define RESET_SYS_CPU_L2		58
>>  #define RESET_SYS_CPU_P			59
>>  #define RESET_SYS_CPU_MBIST		60
>> -/*					61	*/
>> +#define RESET_ACODEC			61
>>  /*					62	*/
>>  /*					63	*/
>>  /*	RESET2					*/
>
> Thank you, applied to reset/next.

Hi Philip,

It seems reset/next has not made it to v5.7-rc1

Would it be possible to provide an immutable branch with this change, or
maybe let Kevin apply this change through the amlogic tree ?

It would allow us to progress on some DT changes during this new cycle.

Thanks
Jerome

>
> regards
> Philipp