Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932207AbWB1P3M (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:29:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932218AbWB1P3M (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:29:12 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:27909 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932207AbWB1P3L (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:29:11 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:28:47 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Hannes Reinecke , Linux Kernel , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixup ahci suspend / resume Message-ID: <20060228152847.GE24981@suse.de> References: <44045FB1.5040408@suse.de> <440468DB.5060605@pobox.com> <20060228151928.GC24981@suse.de> <44046AC2.1060002@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44046AC2.1060002@pobox.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1537 Lines: 37 On Tue, Feb 28 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: > >Upstream 2.6.x certainly _does_ care about suspend/resume! To me, this > >patch seems simple enough to be included. It's little more than > >splitting the register init out form the port_stop/start functions and > >calling them on resume/suspend appropriately. > > Upstream _libata_ doesn't care much about suspend/resume. Officially, > its a work in progress with major pieces -- your patch and ACPI -- still > missing. Eh my patch is not missing, it's been merged since the start of 2.6.16-rc. The acpi patch is still missing, however that's not required on all machines. So SATA suspend should work now, at least on ata_piix which is the only driver that currently enables it. For 2.6.15 I agree, we don't care about suspend since it basically cannot work. That's not the case for 2.6.16 though. > Further, good improvements covering some of the changes in Hannes' patch > are already in #upstream. > > Thus, it's more work than its worth to care about the patch as-is. It > should be redone against #upstream, which is where all suspend/resume > development is occurring. I'm sure Hannes will regenerate against upstream as well if necessary, however that depends on when this should be applied. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/