Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932435AbWB1TQO (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:16:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932442AbWB1TQO (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:16:14 -0500 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:12234 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932435AbWB1TQN (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:16:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:15:37 +0100 (MET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Jan-Benedict Glaw cc: "James C. Georgas" , Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool In-Reply-To: <20060228145217.GM19232@lug-owl.de> Message-ID: References: <20060225160150.GX3674@stusta.de> <1141078686.28136.20.camel@Rainsong.home> <20060228145217.GM19232@lug-owl.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 694 Lines: 20 >> > CONFIG_UNIX=m doesn't make much sense. >> >> I've been building it as a module forever. I often load kernels from >> floppy disk, and building CONFIG_UNIX as a module often makes the >> difference between the kernel fitting or not fitting on the disk. Could >> we please keep this functionality? > >Same for me. Maybe make the offer of CONFIG_UNIX=m dependant on the >small/embedded stuff? You mean CONFIG_EXPERT. Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/