Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 20:56:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 20:56:49 -0500 Received: from duck.doc.ic.ac.uk ([146.169.1.46]:55055 "EHLO duck.doc.ic.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 20:56:41 -0500 To: tytso@mit.edu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What protects f_pos? In-Reply-To: <200011112354.eABNs0005918@trampoline.thunk.org> From: David Wragg Date: 12 Nov 2000 01:56:39 +0000 In-Reply-To: tytso@mit.edu's message of "Sat, 11 Nov 2000 18:54:00 -0500" Message-ID: Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org tytso@mit.edu writes: > This looks like it's a bug to me.... although if you have multiple > threads hitting a file descriptor at the same time, you're pretty much > asking for trouble. Yes, I haven't been able to come up with an example that might trigger this that wasn't dubious to begin with. I'll raise this again at a convenient time during 2.5. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/