Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3]ipmi:bt-bmc:Avoid unnecessary judgement
To:     minyard@acm.org
Cc:     arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20200408115958.2848-1-tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
 <20200413113225.GB3587@minyard.net>
 <47c06465-9ae5-42c2-ca00-5c666521bbde@cmss.chinamobile.com>
 <20200413142348.GD3587@minyard.net>
 <3894dab2-0660-999c-6f4c-4b5b9ff57773@cmss.chinamobile.com>
 <20200413215941.GF3587@minyard.net>
From:   Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Message-ID: <73acd099-f9b3-8eeb-f580-297de2321953@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:42:19 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200413215941.GF3587@minyard.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Corey:

On 2020/4/14 5:59, Corey Minyard wrote:
> That is all correct as it is.  If there is an irq specified and it can't
> be requested, that is a problem.  If there is no irq specified, that is
> fine, just info is good.

Okay, I know what you mean, and I will submit the corresponding patch 
tonight according to the questions I raised.

Thanks,

Tang Bin