Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
To:     peterhuewe@gmx.de, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com, jgg@ziepe.ca,
        arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com
Cc:     linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: [PATCH] tpm: fix wrong return value in tpm_pcr_extend
Date:   Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:42:26 +0800
Message-Id: <20200414114226.96691-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

For the algorithm that does not match the bank, a positive
value EINVAL is returned here. I think this is a typo error.
It is necessary to return an error value.

Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
index a438b1206fcb..1621ce818705 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ int tpm_pcr_extend(struct tpm_chip *chip, u32 pcr_idx,
 
 	for (i = 0; i < chip->nr_allocated_banks; i++) {
 		if (digests[i].alg_id != chip->allocated_banks[i].alg_id) {
-			rc = EINVAL;
+			rc = -EINVAL;
 			goto out;
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.17.1