Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932490AbWB1U7G (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:59:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932334AbWB1U7F (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:59:05 -0500 Received: from the.earth.li ([193.201.200.66]:21446 "EHLO the.earth.li") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932554AbWB1U7E (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:59:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:59:03 +0000 From: Jonathan McDowell To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] Make nand block functions use provided byte/word helpers. Message-ID: <20060228205903.GZ14749@earth.li> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2516 Lines: 85 Hi. I've been writing a NAND driver for the flash on the Amstrad E3. One of the peculiarities of this device is that the write & read enable lines are on a latch, rather than strobed by the act of reading/writing from the data latch. As such I've got custom read_byte/write_byte functions defined. However the nand_*_buf functions in drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c are all appropriate, except for the fact they call readb/writeb themselves, instead of using this->read_byte or this->write_byte. The patch below changes them to use these functions, meaning a driver just needs to define read_byte and write_byte functions and gains all the nand_*_buf functions free. Signed-off-by: Jonathan McDowell ---------- --- linux-2.6.15/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c.orig 2006-02-28 20:41:54.000000000 +0000 +++ linux-2.6.15/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c 2006-02-28 20:46:44.000000000 +0000 @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static void nand_write_buf(struct mtd_in struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv; for (i=0; iIO_ADDR_W); + this->write_byte(mtd, buf[i]); } /** @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static void nand_read_buf(struct mtd_inf struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv; for (i=0; iIO_ADDR_R); + buf[i] = this->read_byte(mtd); } /** @@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ static int nand_verify_buf(struct mtd_in struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv; for (i=0; iIO_ADDR_R)) + if (buf[i] != this->read_byte(mtd)) return -EFAULT; return 0; @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static void nand_write_buf16(struct mtd_ len >>= 1; for (i=0; iIO_ADDR_W); + this->write_word(mtd, p[i]); } @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static void nand_read_buf16(struct mtd_i len >>= 1; for (i=0; iIO_ADDR_R); + p[i] = this->read_word(mtd); } /** @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static int nand_verify_buf16(struct mtd_ len >>= 1; for (i=0; iIO_ADDR_R)) + if (p[i] != this->read_word(mtd)) return -EFAULT; return 0; ---------- J. -- [ There are always at least two ways to program the same thing. ] [ http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/ - IPv6 enabled ADSL/dialup/colo ] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/