Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 21:26:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 21:26:38 -0400 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:2564 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 21:26:23 -0400 Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.12-ac5 From: Robert Love To: "Udo A. Steinberg" Cc: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel , laughing@shared-source.org In-Reply-To: <3BD3743C.CF87EE89@delusion.de> In-Reply-To: <3BD3743C.CF87EE89@delusion.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.16.99+cvs.2001.10.18.15.19 (Preview Release) Date: 21 Oct 2001 21:26:58 -0400 Message-Id: <1003714021.1014.144.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2001-10-21 at 21:19, Udo A. Steinberg wrote: > Dave Jones wrote: > > > > Odd, that part builds fine here. The missing declaration you get is > > declared in fixmap.h, which is included from pgalloc.h. Untar a fresh tree, > > and reapply the patch. > > Just in order to ensure I'm not insane, could you try building with the > following .config file? You aren't crazy, it doesn't build here either. The problem is that fixmap.h only includes those defines if CONFIG_IO_APIC is defined. Well, I don't have use IO_APIC (I am UP) but I do define CONFIG_X86_APIC. So it does not compile. So, the problem is that acpitable.c assumes you have both CONFIG_IO_APIC and CONFIG_X86_APIC declared. It shouldn't. Even more important, why is my system compiling acpitable.c now? I don't compile anything to do with ACPI. What needs access to the ACPI tables via Mini-ACPI, now? Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/