Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932629AbWCAAQJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:16:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932728AbWCAAQI (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:16:08 -0500 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:3214 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932629AbWCAAQH (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:16:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:17:25 -0800 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: Jens Axboe Cc: bunk@stusta.de, jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, lkml@rtr.ca, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions Message-Id: <20060228161725.8c731743.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <20060228094053.GT24981@suse.de> References: <20060227061354.GO3674@stusta.de> <4402A219.8010501@pobox.com> <20060227070830.GQ3674@stusta.de> <20060228094053.GT24981@suse.de> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.8.3; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1376 Lines: 34 On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:40:53 +0100 Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:54:17AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > >Subject : 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable (SATA) > > > >References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/159 > > > >Submitter : Mark Lord > > > >Handled-By : Randy Dunlap > > > >Status : one of Randy's patches seems to fix it > > > > > > > > > This is not a regression, libata suspend/resume has always been crappy. > > > It's under active development (by Randy, among others) to fix this. > > > > It might have always been crappy, but it is a regression since > > according to the submitter it is working with 2.6.15. > > It might have worked under lucky circumstances with an idle disk and a > goat sacrifice, so I agree with Jeff that this is definitely not a > regression. To my knowledge, Mark always used my libata suspend patch on > earlier kernels so it's not even an apples-apples comparison. > > So please scratch that entry. I'll third that request/comment. --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/