Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp711557ybz; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:16:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL+PAuFLaiMRH9rlYrWbA9L2yPbiZn0puUl8Ej9RbhZ8EFWjbl6sU0qkBXPdrSOnUeUhxDy X-Received: by 2002:a50:e107:: with SMTP id h7mr28415128edl.124.1586996166879; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:16:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1586996166; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LqVRsUsxWjCv1GZ+rORYxXZKI2S7i5MxuLVfBGEICKZGz6tZBc9dSl/iRF8VYL3UoV ZWRTzLCegbvKx/XDuppZA0/sBFWbjqSeETBh1ykJuOANJjerQFkwMQ+Gm2VTTARbjjTt bovdLCd2cxcIsTyPxNSES4fQ27xPAAGyVmkoiaUsaw/Vd+0MIRM9I7onhCc7bH3mOctO FzbxRpCKVu2T3aiSiJKodX0rePbF/UWrbnZ7CCqvA3jcJLvOfGIg00MuxZ81Po5pLFQ/ KJOk2UeqAW/rTntHS0nT1ER296ilYnTRHZ+dSV0Spzt8942xF1cf0mTiaN2UtthLH96P iCbw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=nYPdlR+qIOnyFbddf0slOuBMxrBo7Y2q8tiKYVT+Q4U=; b=AFO5a1EmUfiybSPejwLhPvSIOYCZHKvbWVCsZ0Pp66b+xtzskiCQaw7kFh+ek/Xq7Z LEyY9dJFRC3IEaFb6sqAkFblNw3tiwrkAn90dHYtB7rzGx9EQF0SfeSCV4Zzeq6K2Tbu TMOzxd8VdwQWZmC6XlkP/O2wP0NBJZgRUaTpeZEouVfFrPLgXTxHvKfQS8lqVCcIru5/ zAOtKTy55yBVaJEHElj6GUr6iDKY6fUWgOO5XjLb3QxwZwy0LxhdcQWQ1lYDyU5z+lXG YmbIFmUBMFabAC5YZks0rLumm3AIsTHBasHhZ8ijoqfDML+wJVDoTrb4JJ6WABxTeQ6f wtgQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b9si11592368eds.201.2020.04.15.17.15.43; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2409990AbgDOPxK (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 11:53:10 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55124 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2404257AbgDOPxH (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 11:53:07 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F54ACA1; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:53:02 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: Mike Stunes Cc: Joerg Roedel , "x86@kernel.org" , "hpa@zytor.com" , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Hellstrom , Jiri Slaby , Dan Williams , Tom Lendacky , Juergen Gross , Kees Cook , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 40/70] x86/sev-es: Setup per-cpu GHCBs for the runtime handler Message-ID: <20200415155302.GD21899@suse.de> References: <20200319091407.1481-1-joro@8bytes.org> <20200319091407.1481-41-joro@8bytes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mike, On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 07:03:44PM +0000, Mike Stunes wrote: > set_memory_decrypted needs to check the return value. I see it > consistently return ENOMEM. I've traced that back to split_large_page > in arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c. I agree that the return code needs to be checked. But I wonder why this happens. The split_large_page() function returns -ENOMEM when alloc_pages() fails. Do you boot the guest with minal RAM assigned? Regards, Joerg