Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932086AbWCAM7d (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2006 07:59:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932106AbWCAM7d (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2006 07:59:33 -0500 Received: from viking.sophos.com ([194.203.134.132]:39697 "EHLO viking.sophos.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932086AbWCAM7c (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2006 07:59:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1141216671.3185.22.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , Herbert Poetzl , Linux Kernel ML , Al Viro Subject: Re: [RFC] vfs: cleanup of permission() MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.2 June 01, 2004 Message-ID: From: tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 12:59:25 +0000 X-MIMETrack: S/MIME Sign by Notes Client on Tvrtko Ursulin/Dev/UK/Sophos(Release 6.5.2|June 01, 2004) at 01/03/2006 12:59:25, Serialize by Notes Client on Tvrtko Ursulin/Dev/UK/Sophos(Release 6.5.2|June 01, 2004) at 01/03/2006 12:59:25, Serialize complete at 01/03/2006 12:59:25, S/MIME Sign failed at 01/03/2006 12:59:25: The cryptographic key was not found, Serialize by Router on Mercury/Servers/Sophos(Release 6.5.5|November 30, 2005) at 01/03/2006 12:59:28, Serialize complete at 01/03/2006 12:59:28 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2099 Lines: 48 Arjan van de Ven wrote on 01/03/2006 12:37:51: > > And finally, please don't remove nameidata. Modules out there depend on it > > are those modules about to merged into the kernel? The current intent See third paragraph of my reply. > infrastructure isn't fulfilling what it should do well, and from what > I've seen on the discussions it sounds that the best way forward is to > undo the current implementation and then roll out one which caters to > the needs of the existing users better. That I don't know so I can't comment at the moment. I haven't seen anything on linux-security-modules recently? > As external module, you have little say so far simply because your usage > isn't visible. I'd urge you to quickly submit your code so that the > things you need from this are better visible to the people who are > thinking and working on the redesign. I know all that, but it is a complicated matter to discuss. That's why I was planning to make a comprehensive announcement which would discuss most of the hot topics. Ideally yes, I would like to merge, but it won't happen now. The first thing I would like to do is establish common ground with other security vendors so that we could approach the problem together. Personaly, I am not sure whether insisting that everything should be a part of kernel is a right thing to do even though I think I understand all the up- and down-sides of both policies. Having said all this above, I am afraid that there will be no other choice but to start working on the announcement asap. :) > > and we at Sophos are about to release a new product which needs it as > > well. > > I assume we're talking about an open source product, or at least kernel > component, here? Of course. Kernel component might be known to some as Talpa and it is released under GPL. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/