Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <c8c8f37f20625922eb114574c544ebb6332ac025.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] lib/vsprintf: Introduce %ptT for time64_t
From:   Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:46:27 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20200416023425.GB30641@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
References: <20200415170046.33374-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
         <20200415132011.624f35f6@gandalf.local.home>
         <20200416023425.GB30641@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.1-2 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 11:34 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/04/15 13:20), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:00:43 +0300
> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > It is a logical continuation of previously applied %ptR for struct rtc_time.
> > > We have few users of time64_t that would like to print it.
> > > 
> > > Andrew, since Petr can't pay attention on this perhaps it can be passed thru
> > > your tree?
> > > 
> > > Sergey, Steven, what do you think?
> > 
> > I'm fine with these changes. Sergey, what do you think?
> 
> I'm not against it in general, I'm slightly concerned if "two users"
> is enough of a justification for new vsprintf() specifier.

Me too as separate functions could be used here.