Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932153AbWCAQSs (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:18:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751179AbWCAQSs (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:18:48 -0500 Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de ([193.174.154.14]:14732 "EHLO mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751053AbWCAQSr (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:18:47 -0500 From: Joerg Schilling Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 17:17:19 +0100 To: tao@acc.umu.se, schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de Cc: twalberg@mindspring.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)) Message-ID: <4405C90F.nailCS133AUDA@burner> References: <43FDD944.nailFUE21NE9H@burner> <20060223160238.GA31520@mindspring.com> <43FDE983.nailFWR613JK4@burner> <20060223172346.GB31520@mindspring.com> <43FDF193.nailG0L117NIN@burner> <20060223175317.GD31520@mindspring.com> <43FEDB63.nailGCX2HX66G@burner> <20060225174410.GN20494@vasa.acc.umu.se> <20060228072431.GR20494@vasa.acc.umu.se> <44049ADE.nailC6L1ZUIFJ@burner> <20060228200108.GV20494@vasa.acc.umu.se> In-Reply-To: <20060228200108.GV20494@vasa.acc.umu.se> User-Agent: nail 11.2 8/15/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1634 Lines: 37 David Weinehall wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > David Weinehall wrote: > > > > > > Uhm, the version of GNU make in Debian (3.81beta4) was released > > > > 12 December 2005; I wouldn't call that dead (or unmaintained). > > > > > > Oh, and as an update, 3.81rc1 was release on the 19th of February 2006. > > > > > > Yeah, very unmaintained and dead upstream... > > > > None of the bugs I did report has been fixed. > > Well, the bug you complain most about is about spewing of some > warnings for something completely harmless. I know of another > certain set of software that spews unnecessary and annoying > warnings. Those haven't been removed for despite complaints for > several years either. Does this mean that cdrecord is an unmaintained > piece of software that's dead upstream? If you do not understand the diffeence between a useful warning (as with cdrecord) and a warning that is a result of a severe bug caused by incorrect make file handling (as in GNU make) you are obviously wrong here. J?rg -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/