Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: AQf1YNrfXGFCkTaTDHusUA6EYcszOs1nRzVxfCN++NR4blKKfVXkFwajp+jqFP3B9pW5KzVMIy
 5N8DcMoFjPhA==
IronPort-SDR: JLjViU3I/7OhNUNFa14OtK4jxawo6cL4DIbAiuwxDw0aNbt8rAsEQeI/aVasFOrEUV6+diXta5
 ZTj7u56OWrjw==
Date:   Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:32:50 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc:     "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" 
        <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
        anders.roxell@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de, brendanhiggins@google.com,
        cheol.yong.kim@intel.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
        masonccyang@mxic.com.tw, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com,
        piotrs@cadence.com, qi-ming.wu@intel.com, richard@nod.at,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, vigneshr@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mtd: rawnand: Add NAND controller support on
 Intel LGM SoC
Message-ID: <20200416113250.GA185537@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20200414022433.36622-3-vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
 <20200415220533.733834-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
 <c33c8653-16a2-5bcd-97a9-511d958b755a@linux.intel.com>
 <20200416113822.2ef326cb@collabora.com>
 <18568cf6-2955-472e-7b68-eb35e654a906@linux.intel.com>
 <20200416122619.2c481792@collabora.com>
 <d3e137fa-54a0-b4ec-eb24-3984eab2a247@linux.intel.com>
 <20200416131725.51259573@collabora.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200416131725.51259573@collabora.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 01:17:25PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:40:53 +0800
> "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX"
> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > >>> we'll be happy to have one more of the existing driver converted to  
> > >>> ->exec_op() ;-).  
> > >> I have completely adapted to ->exec_op() hook up to replace the legacy
> > >> call-back.  
> > > I suspect porting what you've done to the xway driver shouldn't be too
> > > complicated.  
> > Not ported from xway_nand.c driver , we have developed from the scratch 
> > to make it work on
> > Intel LGM SoC , it's new x86 ATOM based SoC, IP itself completely 
> > different and most of the registers won't match.
> > if we port then it would be ugly and also what are the problem may occur 
> > we do not know.
> 
> Sorry but IMO they look similar enough to try to merge them.

I agree. I tried to convince them internally... but here we are.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko