Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 03:58:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 03:58:33 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:45575 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 03:58:20 -0400 Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.12-ac5 To: rml@tech9.net (Robert Love) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 09:05:07 +0100 (BST) Cc: reality@delusion.de (Udo A. Steinberg), davej@suse.de (Dave Jones), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux Kernel), laughing@shared-source.org In-Reply-To: <1003714021.1014.144.camel@phantasy> from "Robert Love" at Oct 21, 2001 09:26:58 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > You aren't crazy, it doesn't build here either. The problem is that > fixmap.h only includes those defines if CONFIG_IO_APIC is defined. > Well, I don't have use IO_APIC (I am UP) but I do define > CONFIG_X86_APIC. So it does not compile. Ahah that would make sense. > So, the problem is that acpitable.c assumes you have both CONFIG_IO_APIC > and CONFIG_X86_APIC declared. It shouldn't. Even more important, why > is my system compiling acpitable.c now? I don't compile anything to do > with ACPI. What needs access to the ACPI tables via Mini-ACPI, now? It is needed for a small number of certain newer SMP systems, and potentially a lot more stuff in the near future. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/