Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp1689139ybz; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:44:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLcA+GgjrnLsQMCSY1xyaePCv5Oz/zEtAU82zK01kbcSAvu0XL12e0Jv6eGijVcRrUO4SJ4 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:614a:: with SMTP id p10mr11763178ejl.88.1587069887632; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:44:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587069887; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vG+GQGy6nC4L65eIqZrqIYS232cIHCdUv/5GzTkGNr2A0TGqEQmshZaxxfxst3cjj2 blwNG3TUuxaMhVxDkkaEl3KxiQJB9RTzMP4JXh/lCV1MBuc0Ic10YogWCk5Qwtm1I3mI dSBCtGc6DoEGoeWt3UT5HPM9W3/U8FFeuKRQcNrLXvvTawFBGdaBdfYvKeGk5RZLmoAI zC5bMv+IDqBl6H/LfF5k+cNA2djt941LzqtALJ1GsP/+J1iZw7Jz5V8zmwqPea8+nqSc KTz+WyvNjbD5770pgj/cvuvRag90vIhYr6msr9hl2F2xG5UxnxCg881KN5aocCnpYXpB y34w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=En8a9OfgFteW3m95ox2NXgQt0GaK2x1PYnYvAasaCWs=; b=lbzcVTpjEwamp/I9hUOkcsYnYTXRywqR/vXENsuXDVNLK0sjwswupbU2K59fNkdhkt OUjXtfUarHIRQJrqlT04If6Aq2WsSirQfv2p1RtdPLjwnZdlR37m4yWxTRFNzx/hxlMY s//66IKvbmJAbkYCfztDwcov0rHzQRUViwdN/fRz3SHZXE39Fp4pF1O/dTnEzxtNzC5D nrbdGhoG/5EaxWuAODsdoI76T1jT57DuBW6KNZFYCm7iR38w9Vl5e0bMONTAQUiPCSom Xmg4s+LzlM3uFy7WEXyP/PVGvlfYdKQWZPWaXb2CdpIVMkSf47/U4YmX2urp44pBBDCa ZCEw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ziepe.ca header.s=google header.b=MuXkSZQi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e9si6108904eds.63.2020.04.16.13.44.24; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ziepe.ca header.s=google header.b=MuXkSZQi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731224AbgDPSr7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:47:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49332 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729744AbgDPSr5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:47:57 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf42.google.com (mail-qv1-xf42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E6BDC061A0F for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:47:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qv1-xf42.google.com with SMTP id s18so2589365qvn.1 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:47:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=En8a9OfgFteW3m95ox2NXgQt0GaK2x1PYnYvAasaCWs=; b=MuXkSZQiiVR1PEk7+YTmlEUZCK3yGEHFaQqPh4S5joJgqa3VjvuC0DWIz6x4Rt9Ypd Cw4VLEhbCS4MbfQXPkvt0yAUibmK3z54SmoKM7bAR6xmm0Neyj6RvQTq3GqTrs6XRnXT HE+Ffi67KVZExUAm2dZQJemGW2fdTd2kzl8vPSz7QRcnaowoj5XVYuUj2cKUZ3AyowPa ie5A6Oksfy/1bByzcPxLjyDKCJHPOH6ihIPOsPN2ZNSJKvSRBgdv8SfjNXbGCPdk4pUB k15sY3dgRtQw23US1RIFflpCYm2SGEEeQa4VPqzr6Yb+3sm73/hDUESLbX04TYC8tXI3 yK8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=En8a9OfgFteW3m95ox2NXgQt0GaK2x1PYnYvAasaCWs=; b=ItJiKq2E32sNnoqNBhfDz/sE3/o8YsXHuyDeXqhGwWLtQyyQwTTJa7RlFwTP535RNp LEgck7E/BFJ0wewmCo0dAgo9DnPfRAr5tNJOd7bKmgB5HxklNgyRzWvJg/1du3d1To7j EIvAzDvyJZ86Ow6vWIFpme1X0YwdAKw1ksA54p23hmum9XGKIjHF8rqDEWYyYwzzRQOd fxvxF1zDVkPpaBkx1YEqBI+eLbgatzJe6+psK5mcOGM+sCaCjXb2UYIru4Px6QCbBwEY ZosBYugW/OoYogH4FNp0Q663oOtGKZXdpvwHG5ojuOlRp3x7jwq1Rov7d+FHBYIlQQiY +Ulg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYpcYY2fu8EiL0cPaZ7+bX4TiZWx6D/rFxVO+vPI0O2cz8EiF5H 16I4oTxqcproriG7bLMtoqU0xQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:17ce:: with SMTP id cu14mr11534107qvb.51.1587062875176; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:47:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-142-68-57-212.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [142.68.57.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h3sm1005577qkf.15.2020.04.16.11.47.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jgg by mlx.ziepe.ca with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jP9YI-0006rv-2e; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 15:47:54 -0300 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 15:47:54 -0300 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Christophe JAILLET , selvin.xavier@broadcom.com, devesh.sharma@broadcom.com, dledford@redhat.com, leon@kernel.org, colin.king@canonical.com, roland@purestorage.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/ocrdma: Fix an off-by-one issue in 'ocrdma_add_stat' Message-ID: <20200416184754.GZ5100@ziepe.ca> References: <20200328073040.24429-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> <20200414183441.GA28870@ziepe.ca> <20200416130847.GP1163@kadam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200416130847.GP1163@kadam> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 04:08:47PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:34:41PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > The memcpy is still kind of silly right? What about this: > > > > static int ocrdma_add_stat(char *start, char *pcur, char *name, u64 count) > > { > > size_t len = (start + OCRDMA_MAX_DBGFS_MEM) - pcur; > > int cpy_len; > > > > cpy_len = snprintf(pcur, len, "%s: %llu\n", name, count); > > if (cpy_len >= len || cpy_len < 0) { > > The kernel version of snprintf() doesn't and will never return > negatives. It would cause a huge security headache if it started > returning negatives. Begs the question why it returns an int then :) Thanks, Jason