Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp125669ybz; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:02:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLRA9F/4uarHAPQwmp7JEb82pUTKaAGNGbpbcDqgvZyFZ2p86tdKJzDiQl3X9/0CDX7xM4F X-Received: by 2002:a50:f058:: with SMTP id u24mr1143431edl.171.1587096150833; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:02:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587096150; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IxqLCNvcVrFEijmULDV/k6KiqBvQhqu0aEyRjxzUaxfaMbYxtohSWPrPNVwJVC/RPW gCnWaH6wHKnLvTJJpwUuZUQ42yY6ik7j9TBI9kq3+jchKJyiFkgAMTxIEnu0v2Y+Yvi7 Q1oZ78E9gvb2wSJ14vgw2HbrcfigPHyJyNKRL44gQLar9EQJ5vV82ya5XUInQuDyOEpR xNpKC237gcdzy+ukEBdwinLgA82cvjS+9Fi07VJUOmbOyUW7bww7c3Nzb3EtuGSXKhNg pFH7EAgxpo/HqktnpjhMwgL8kIuz4i5WDq4t8LX4t4P57Za4meXQJ+2Cq4Df36Y4YYFW g3Ew== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=Tfu3bp47S3MUI5ci5Hq3u6NkU5AAnFb20WjtjLdDxiw=; b=jRfQkxxGGMLtP4/eFfK0iUzzVTBNSGhjL8eHKOJRE2gMI8MXr+vKHzMXp4M5Ed8m8I Ek0KnGLyL+TdeDxGgcWk20ionsF+HX1I5V+lDu5b8l6zqR5+jVb0w+6T96PSc2t5KVaW zfDjtG7k+g/0trJD+4wj0BNNsxOKx2AUQIZl4h6NIkzu+4NhxeRyW45jJGm7vX5hyXnr 3wFv/po8qKrciLPkoS58aoGFNy371DC/6M8L4GSPnw2M5xgzaTMLcLG0ti5DYwJub4UC Hnb6x8vsA0J1knHC15+3L+Qv+QkwZBI9RiXhZdoEBW0m2IR08jCOUDvowUdAcBjg7dK/ 3UiQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ck5si13211025ejb.12.2020.04.16.21.02.07; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726117AbgDQEA5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:00:57 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:2058 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725294AbgDQEA5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:00:57 -0400 Received: from DGGEMM406-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 6240A28D598212C2D629; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:00:54 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) by DGGEMM406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:00:53 +0800 Received: from [10.65.91.233] (10.65.91.233) by dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:00:53 +0800 Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto tree To: Stephen Rothwell , Herbert Xu , Linux Crypto List CC: Linux Next Mailing List , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , Zhou Wang , Zaibo Xu , Yang Shen , Hui Tang References: <20200417134003.318184a6@canb.auug.org.au> From: Shukun Tan Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:00:53 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200417134003.318184a6@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.65.91.233] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggeme715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.111) To dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/4/17 11:40, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the crypto tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/crypto/hisilicon/qm.c: In function 'qm_soft_reset': > drivers/crypto/hisilicon/qm.c:2915:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_evaluate_integer'; did you mean 'acpi_evaluate_object'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 2915 | s = acpi_evaluate_integer(ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev), > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | acpi_evaluate_object > > Caused by commit > > 6c6dd5802c2d ("crypto: hisilicon/qm - add controller reset interface") > > I have reverted the following commits for today > > f037fc5f93f4 crypto: hisilicon/qm - stop qp by judging sq and cq tail > 141876c252a4 crypto: hisilicon/sec2 - add controller reset support for SEC2 > 1f5c9f34f0cc crypto: hisilicon/hpre - add controller reset support for HPRE > 84c9b7802b02 crypto: hisilicon/zip - add controller reset support for zip > 6c6dd5802c2d crypto: hisilicon/qm - add controller reset interface > Hi Stephen, The 'kbuild test robot' has reported this, I will fix it as soon as possible. Best, Shukun