Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:11:12 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
        Jon Grimm <jon.grimm@amd.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] unencrypted atomic DMA pools with dynamic expansion
Message-ID: <20200417071112.GD19153@lst.de>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2004141700480.68516@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2004141700480.68516@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

So modulo a few comments that I can fix up myself this looks good.  Unless
you want to resend for some reason I'm ready to pick this up once I open
the dma-mapping tree after -rc2.