Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp422675ybz; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 03:42:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJJZOg9SN8K6bYyUKjLD91gsIADKtY4Ge3Va4zmShdh9XF5Uds+YymYI0Khi224DGXXAORe X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1185:: with SMTP id uz5mr2402273ejb.335.1587120168443; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 03:42:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587120168; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MjtYlDTnkwOK4e7EuQOKMvoNg806pikj4MplCpnIzBWZ2FoLoNeJxKQB4ptl8AB/lz n5DyEt6w8iRdTur4qKZ2i4b1aGCuWTWrcTqIZLibmVHWg4tu+NdRsz054zuGMDxtsdSx 7dqrAatP+/YV21GjIHSCCq2jl5aPmOISaAASO0TYyZV7+lR+VFHTa9jqaH1Qo3+d/BX4 HDE3DP4ukpJL6hIWzRrsm+tXqajzmWF8YigZLbAzDhCRvu5kKF+Ziig9OzZmcfozgqlP pFOUx2FldQo4m5Os+37eVxUXNQa5OF6xhpJYl2v+ffvGIJQuNZR79zpuZTAZj7cJ1w1c Y43g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id:dkim-signature; bh=5A/F7VAUyX+LaAiSKDGQkCfAAjs59V/4rltgsd6HWd4=; b=wmh53Nl3PA1Ma+Rl12wHs6dUQvqaYK6BnjNyRoCRsNfTRhXZxSVy8lzJ+QNNKNaR85 9D+W+wCngbS9koelwLqgJ5DP5zPTIMU56N+ZGQMWjQnJDw8fZVnn3WEfhGtMejNlaDH6 JZ1pBACxFvEjzLFZ7bIdJMd8dekNNQKIdlMosgrxrRZWz87rjlbYvGgyTcNj69vxfn3j CKyf8wa3I9Qmz/+su2JEstpM6ZpDA9FcUNRkcu6/oD61K6isDKgnNe8WPAFb/SdM2zK4 UTEJYRu3Rh2halvTldxWoOI2ANchIv7YoZysbb8Qd/nJGxbjnpk2vOUXYoA7mTHGHfd6 fqFg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=k9CleFO0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ce26si14762135edb.172.2020.04.17.03.42.24; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 03:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=k9CleFO0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729277AbgDQKl3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 06:41:29 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53616 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726469AbgDQKl3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 06:41:29 -0400 Received: from tleilax.poochiereds.net (68-20-15-154.lightspeed.rlghnc.sbcglobal.net [68.20.15.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A14D2221EA; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:41:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1587120089; bh=lHB1NoiGfUWFSxW01s7mCG3LNiTaqRJg8T1vS2BHcBU=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=k9CleFO05+Sm/1UuSuKkUY01NFgjtGs8zgfK6CZmawo5OAMlytqJ1y8tTLaF8f/P7 rfvZgNdpms/NGDCdtzzaPuDkMNZRFidrG48GgEHLPrajOIkVgY3rpKNL/xHoQd1qkI oSOrdTGsOqrgs34zI5+WXpEe0n7tPmmGd/121aFU= Message-ID: Subject: Re: [v2] ceph: if we are blacklisted, __do_request returns directly From: Jeff Layton To: Yanhu Cao Cc: sage@redhat.com, idryomov@gmail.com, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 06:41:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200417093626.10892-1-gmayyyha@gmail.com> References: <20200417093626.10892-1-gmayyyha@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 (3.34.4-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2020-04-17 at 17:36 +0800, Yanhu Cao wrote: > If we mount cephfs by the recover_session option, > __do_request can return directly until the client automatically reconnects. > > Signed-off-by: Yanhu Cao > --- > fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c > index 486f91f9685b..e6cda256b136 100644 > --- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c > +++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c > @@ -2708,6 +2708,12 @@ static void __do_request(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc, > > put_request_session(req); > > + if (mdsc->fsc->blacklisted && > + ceph_test_mount_opt(mdsc->fsc, CLEANRECOVER)) { > + err = -EACCES; > + goto finish; > + } > + > mds = __choose_mds(mdsc, req, &random); > if (mds < 0 || > ceph_mdsmap_get_state(mdsc->mdsmap, mds) < CEPH_MDS_STATE_ACTIVE) { We do have an EBLACKLISTED error defined, which is the same as ESHUTDOWN. The read and write code can return that when the client is blacklisted. Same for cap handling (in __ceph_pool_perm_get. Should this return -EBLACKLISTED instead? -- Jeff Layton