Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp708392ybz; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:38:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLf44jDRv5bn2EdyveKkH5j/eB5MWFrTIgCEx1Y1//s+AOX8SP77ZJPLlk6xsagi4GJ3cAB X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c9ce:: with SMTP id hk14mr3544847ejb.314.1587137893898; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:38:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587137893; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iUftWmeEcSImteON9lLcTaWP1rooa3Ss11q9gETzeKMo1m6k/6PNyYM0qFqiVf05j2 mRsm6i51sZirmIaqOm0Q81icCLiN71n5hGaDqdAi8huH8w+ACdnGBW+KmuSZ1fVhO8dz ftzeAlxkIngpV1KrNVQd6nxSeD5KBdsC6duMbboQMMvLaRwZLq+70E73iPgE8LcHqE8M jHhFPEeWN889vNguzpqkYnek+ASH9LhccFeInG82ckSaPzJ9mYK6noJgZh7PSwAbOXMI JiyV0/TnfQdGVEdRxZchTXiMLC3jbfqLW7RYCbD+rpinYvA3RR4mMIneOm3rx6Foo0um /OZQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:references:cc:to:from:subject:dkim-signature; bh=hJeyNDpmGRXVeIvbuGZyC5Hmururm2U2J7LTl5PaVDY=; b=cgsnJZnIy4T9073eZaFJh1g4YsbsF2JKoJgcq1UDggSR/mYtpKl0LgGfOC0jp3wak1 KAwWWuJGbH6t9gGR4TAMY91yVCIX86RIbZQVNmPE3At1hxbtJoGeIV1pj18vsM/qnizh 94KqOuJx3l8dCqM78YqemdvhJVyfIabYyIHpfoK5SgeMS9mNWBQ79WBaBwwdJmJstA2z GyMqn9Vo/7yfIo3rGiWXioaRYIc8x5GGTTWrWr0kzw6DA0auKdC+dmMPplXt/B+c7odh EfoX0MUD+9RQxt2Ioml8P0GPsPOf3GPrY14/TuauTQlUfVgqb1NfpNndb/6+3keBMqhO o+4g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=Ltd7kDcs; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cn8si6114856edb.226.2020.04.17.08.37.50; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:38:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=Ltd7kDcs; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729318AbgDQPfy (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:35:54 -0400 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:47540 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728956AbgDQPfy (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:35:54 -0400 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 03HFZq48090492; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:35:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1587137752; bh=hJeyNDpmGRXVeIvbuGZyC5Hmururm2U2J7LTl5PaVDY=; h=Subject:From:To:CC:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Ltd7kDcszWTv7cdimoUV3xi/9vpHRt6ZIJT8OoIEDhAAiIL4+01zakWMZuiOdW0Pk zgQ78fyXxe4p27f8v6cPj+gs76KGPcJK1rjkVl3tRTsuEW2/sFhkRBbe6KjjVXmubA 5t7dgA+ooJ8spbgjF7zhemgG6n0r3dfgxDkRb0vU= Received: from DLEE109.ent.ti.com (dlee109.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.41]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 03HFZqp6065739 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:35:52 -0500 Received: from DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) by DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:35:52 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:35:52 -0500 Received: from [10.250.48.148] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 03HFZpQm089838; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:35:51 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] remoteproc: Split rproc_ops allocation from rproc_alloc() From: Suman Anna To: Mathieu Poirier , , CC: , , , References: <20200415204858.2448-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> <20200415204858.2448-7-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> <61497230-40ec-ffc6-3cc0-e5cb754ac859@ti.com> Message-ID: <58eaa90a-9777-4abe-fbf7-229cc68a37aa@ti.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:35:51 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <61497230-40ec-ffc6-3cc0-e5cb754ac859@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/17/20 8:49 AM, Suman Anna wrote: > On 4/15/20 3:48 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: >> Make the rproc_ops allocation a function on its own in an effort >> to clean up function rproc_alloc(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier >> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder >> --- >>   drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++----------- >>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> index 0bfa6998705d..a5a0ceb86b3f 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> @@ -2001,6 +2001,25 @@ static int rproc_alloc_firmware(struct rproc >> *rproc, >>       return 0; >>   } >> +static int rproc_alloc_ops(struct rproc *rproc, const struct >> rproc_ops *ops) >> +{ >> +    rproc->ops = kmemdup(ops, sizeof(*ops), GFP_KERNEL); >> +    if (!rproc->ops) >> +        return -ENOMEM; >> + >> +    /* Default to ELF loader if no load function is specified */ >> +    if (!rproc->ops->load) { >> +        rproc->ops->load = rproc_elf_load_segments; >> +        rproc->ops->parse_fw = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table; >> +        rproc->ops->find_loaded_rsc_table = >> +                        rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table; >> +        rproc->ops->sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check; > > So, the conditional check on sanity check is dropped and the callback > switched here without the changelog reflecting anything why. You should > just rebase this patch on top of Clement's patch [1] that removes the > conditional flag, and also usage from the remoteproc platform drivers. > > regards > Suman > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11462013/ Sorry, gave the wrong link, that was v1. This is the latest, https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11466955/ > > >> +        rproc->ops->get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr; >> +    } >> + >> +    return 0; >> +} >> + >>   /** >>    * rproc_alloc() - allocate a remote processor handle >>    * @dev: the underlying device >> @@ -2040,8 +2059,7 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, >> const char *name, >>       if (rproc_alloc_firmware(rproc, name, firmware)) >>           goto free_rproc; >> -    rproc->ops = kmemdup(ops, sizeof(*ops), GFP_KERNEL); >> -    if (!rproc->ops) >> +    if (rproc_alloc_ops(rproc, ops)) >>           goto free_firmware; >>       rproc->name = name; >> @@ -2068,16 +2086,6 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, >> const char *name, >>       atomic_set(&rproc->power, 0); >> -    /* Default to ELF loader if no load function is specified */ >> -    if (!rproc->ops->load) { >> -        rproc->ops->load = rproc_elf_load_segments; >> -        rproc->ops->parse_fw = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table; >> -        rproc->ops->find_loaded_rsc_table = >> rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table; >> -        if (!rproc->ops->sanity_check) >> -            rproc->ops->sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check; >> -        rproc->ops->get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr; >> -    } >> - >>       mutex_init(&rproc->lock); >>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rproc->carveouts); >> >